Published AAO appeal decisions

An ESL teacher sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO dismissed a third motion to reconsider, finding the petitioner reargued previously rejected arguments without establishing error in law or policy. The underlying denial stood because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of his proposed endeavor.

Financial analyst seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed at least three of ten criteria. AAO found no major international award and rejected high salary criterion on improper comparison basis, leaving petitioner below three-criterion threshold. Reserved remaining criteria. Dismissed appeal.

An IT project manager with advanced degree claims NIW to establish healthcare consulting company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding although underlying EB-2 eligibility established, proposed endeavor lacks national importance; job creation projections insufficient without evidence of regional or national economic impact.

A business administrator with advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW classification. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed consulting endeavor. Work would benefit direct clients only without broader industry impact. Appeal dismissed under first Dhanasar prong.

A petitioner claiming exceptional ability for an EB-2 national interest waiver filed successive motions to reopen and reconsider after initial denials. The AAO dismissed the second motion, finding the petitioner had been given notice of required evidence and a reasonable opportunity to submit it, and that no new facts or legal errors warranted reconsideration.

Researcher in hydrometeorology and AI-driven precipitation forecasting with Master's degree sought NIW. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish national importance; work as model tester on NASA-funded projects lacked broader field impact and showed no role as principal investigator or named funding recipient.

An accountant sought EB-2 NIW. A second motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed. New evidence established she met the EB-2 advanced degree requirement, overcoming one ground, but she failed to present new facts establishing NIW eligibility under Dhanasar.

A thermal energy researcher with an advanced degree in physics seeks an NIW for research on high thermal conductivity semiconductors. The petitioner demonstrated substantial merit through peer-reviewed publications with high citations, government research funding, and expert support. The AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied and sustained the appeal.

A self-petitioning professional with an advanced degree sought a national interest waiver. After earlier denial and several dismissed appeals and motions, a fourth combined motion to reopen and reconsider claimed ineffective assistance of prior counsel. The AAO dismissed it because no prejudice or substantial compliance with the required procedure was shown, and the arguments were repeated.

A public health informatics fellow sought EB-2 NIW classification for self-petitioned waiver. The applicant held an advanced degree but failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific proposed endeavor in the Dhanasar first prong. The appeal was dismissed without addressing other prongs.

Childcare education professional seeking EB-2 exceptional ability with national interest waiver. Met all six initial evidence criteria but failed final merits determination showing expertise significantly above ordinary in field. Appeal dismissed without reaching NIW prongs.

Financial analyst, accountant and auditor with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because her proposed financial services endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance under Dhanasar framework, showing no substantial economic impact or national implications.

A petitioner in cybersecurity and IT governance filed a motion to reopen a dismissed NIW petition. The AAO dismissed the motion, finding the new executive orders and strategic documents did not establish new facts warranting reconsideration, as they did not address errors in prior dismissals or demonstrate changed circumstances.

Business consultant self-petitioner claimed six extraordinary ability criteria. AAO dismissed motion to reconsider, upholding prior findings that published material, original contributions, and scholarly articles criteria were not met. Membership and leading role criteria were reserved as unnecessary since three criteria minimum was not satisfied.

A barber and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW to establish a barbershop and school. The AAO dismissed a third motion to reopen and reconsider, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of the endeavor and did not meet criteria for exceptional ability; new industry articles about barber shops did not specifically address this applicant's particular proposed endeavor.

A singer-composer self-petitioned for EB-1A. Demonstrated two criteria: lesser awards and exhibition display. Failed to establish three required criteria. AAO affirmed denial because the evidentiary threshold was not met, reserving final merits analysis.

A fitness and health professional with advanced degree seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. Petitioner proposed fitness training endeavor. Service center and AAO found no national importance because business plan lacked specificity and independent evidence, and proposed work would impact only clients, not the industry broadly.

Aviation consultant seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed proposed company would provide economic revitalization, employment, and advance aviation safety. AAO held endeavor lacks national importance: limited employment potential, no evidence of industry-wide impact, and unsubstantiated claims about safety and sustainability.

Engineer seeking NIW for electrical engineering consulting startup. Petitioner claimed endeavor had national importance for energy systems and sustainability. AAO dismissed motion, finding articles showed field importance but not specific endeavor impact or prospective national significance.

A graduate research and teaching assistant in computer science sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for AI research in medical diagnostics. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding he did not satisfy the second Dhanasar prong because he lacked adequate graduate credentials, strong publication records, secured research positions, or demonstrated funding.

Medical researcher with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2. AAO held proposed research has substantial merit and national importance but petitioner not well positioned to advance it, lacking documented plan, prior success in similar efforts, or evidence of led funded research projects.

An industrial production management consultant self-petitioning for EB-2 NIW sought to establish a consulting business providing operational efficiency services. The AAO affirmed denial because the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond local business impacts and employment projections, failing the first Dhanasar prong.

Registered nurse with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for preventive healthcare program in rural and underserved communities but failed first Dhanasar prong; while addressing important public health need, proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance or broader field implications required by precedent.

A quantum chemist self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO remanded the case, finding he met three initial criteria including original contributions, and instructed the service center to conduct final merits determination on totality of evidence.

A petitioner sought NIW EB-2 classification but the service center denied it without adequately analyzing the evidence. The AAO remanded, finding the service center did not properly discuss the petitioner's detailed endeavor description, did not evaluate factors in totality for the second prong, and did not adequately weigh considerations for the third prong.