Published AAO appeal decisions

Nurse sought NIW for proposed company providing nursing services in Florida area. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific endeavor despite occupational shortage discussion. Revenue and employment projections lacked significance demonstrating substantial economic effects at national level.

Clinical psychologist and entrepreneur seeking EB-2 NIW to manage psychology clinic in Florida. Self-petitioner. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance; clinic's impact limited to patients with no demonstrated broader implications for psychology field or significant U.S. economic effects.

Self-petitioner, professor in Nigeria with Ph.D., proposed research on nanostructured materials to remove contaminants and microplastics from water for treatment and desalination. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: research has national importance for U.S. water quality; petitioner well positioned to advance with relevant expertise and track record.

An oil industry professional seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification claimed four criteria including awards, membership, original contributions, and leading role. The AAO dismissed, finding none met the standards; the honorary certificate and professional association membership lacked required recognition level, and employer contributions did not establish national acclaim.

Furniture design manager sought NIW for interior design business focusing on Chinese-style and wooden furniture. AAO held substantial merit was established but national importance was not; field importance and worker shortage cannot substitute for demonstrable prospective impact of specific endeavor.

A logistics management consultant sought NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional proposing to establish a consulting company. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient evidence of substantial positive economic effects or national importance beyond serving particular clients.

Television and film producer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met published material criterion but failed three remaining claimed criteria. Appeal dismissed because petitioner established only one criterion and lacks sustained national or international acclaim at top of field.

A biostatistician sought EB-2 classification with NIW. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but failed to demonstrate national importance of the proposed endeavor. The testimony addressed field importance, not the specific endeavor's prospective impact.

Marketing executive sought EB-2 with NIW claiming endeavor enables U.S. companies to globalize through localized marketing campaigns. AAO held general industry importance insufficient; petitioner failed to provide specific evidence that his proposed work impacts U.S. economy, job creation, or trade interests.

A restaurant entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. The AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner met only two of six criteria and failed final merits review; evidence of business success and awards did not establish expertise significantly above ordinary level in the field.

A general manager of ethnic grocery stores seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO held the specific endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar because evidence addresses field importance and business operations, not broader implications or documented significant U.S. employment potential.

A martial arts instructor claimed three EB-1A criteria: association membership, published material, and leading roles. The AAO found membership did not satisfy regulatory requirements, and with only three criteria claimed, failure of one prevented reaching the minimum threshold. Appeal dismissed without final merits analysis.

An advanced degree marketing professional seeks EB-2 NIW for a startup marketing and business development company focused on SMEs. Director denied the petition. AAO affirmed, finding the endeavor has merit but lacks national importance; job creation and economic projections in a single firm are insufficient under Dhanasar.

Advanced degree professional proposed an endeavor with claimed economic impact. AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the proposed endeavor has national importance; evidence showed only client-level benefits, not broader industry or economic implications meeting Dhanasar standards.

Cybersecurity professional sought EB-2 NIW for proposed work developing advanced payment security and fraud detection systems. AAO found substantial merit but concluded endeavor lacked national importance; work would not extend beyond prospective employers or customers to impact field broadly or produce substantial economic benefits.

An immigration document preparer and entrepreneur with advanced degree seeking EB-2 classification with NIW. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner failed to establish national importance of the proposed endeavor, which involved immigration services and employment.

Electrical engineering researcher sought EB-2 NIW for work on renewable energy integration into power grids. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance; research shows no implications beyond university context; appeal dismissed.

An individual sought EB-1A classification based on extraordinary ability. The Director found he met three initial evidentiary criteria but lacked sustained national or international acclaim and top-tier status. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the petitioner waived the challenge to the intent-to-continue-work requirement by not addressing it on appeal, making that dispositive issue sufficient to dismiss without reaching other arguments.

Chief executive officer and entrepreneur seeking EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. Claimed all six regulatory criteria for exceptional ability. AAO affirmed Director's denial because petitioner failed to satisfy any of the six criteria required for exceptional ability; without underlying EB-2 eligibility, NIW claim could not be reached.

A business and logistics specialist sought EB-2 NIW for work in the import-export industry. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance because it showed only employer-specific cost reduction, not broader field impact or documented job creation potential.

Entrepreneur in cargo transportation and logistics sought EB-2 NIW as exceptional ability individual. AAO held petitioner met only one of six required criteria for exceptional ability and withdrew membership finding; appeal dismissed as petitioner ineligible for underlying classification.

A preschool teacher sought EB-2 advanced degree classification and NIW for a regional teaching business. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance, with insufficient evidence of broader field impact or substantial economic benefits.

Chief executive sought EB-2 NIW to develop online application providing mental health strategies. AAO held endeavor has merit but lacks national importance; projected employment of eight jobs and modest profit do not meet Dhanasar's substantial economic effects threshold.

Real estate entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW for affordable housing initiative. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient prospective impact extending beyond the petitioner's clients to demonstrate national importance or substantial positive economic effects required by Dhanasar.

Biochemist seeking EB-1A claimed extraordinary ability in sciences. AAO held petitioner met only two criteria and failed on original contributions because evidence lacked objective demonstration of major significance, reliable citation metrics, or proof of field-wide impact.