Published AAO appeal decisions

A sales director seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO held he did not qualify for underlying EB-2 classification as exceptional ability, having failed to meet at least three of six regulatory criteria. National interest waiver analysis was not reached because eligibility for the base classification was not established.

Pharmaceutical executive with 25 years experience sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner met published material criterion but failed to establish at least three required criteria for extraordinary ability. AAO held insufficient evidence of national or international acclaim.

General and operations manager applied for NIW under EB-2 with advanced degree. Petitioner proposed consulting services for general operations management and entrepreneurship. AAO affirmed Director's finding that while work had substantial merit, it lacked national importance; no evidence showed broader field impact or substantial positive economic effects for U.S. economy.

Media production agency petitioned for O-1A classification for senior vice president of production finance. AAO dismissed motions, finding only one criterion met and insufficient documentation of membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.

Bank manager seeking national interest waiver. Director found substantial merit but denied on national importance grounds. AAO affirmed and additionally withdrew director's second-prong finding due to petitioner's inconsistent evidence about the proposed endeavor.

A digital product and business manager in mobile communications claimed three criteria but could not substantiate high remuneration with proper comparative salary data for UK positions and long-term compensation. AAO dismissed, finding the incomplete survey data inadequate and declining to reach other claimed criteria or prospective benefit analysis.

A CEO of a cleaning service company sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He failed to meet the required three initial evidentiary criteria; his entrepreneurship award was student-limited, and chamber membership lacked the outstanding achievement requirement, leaving him ineligible for final merits analysis.

Entrepreneur and venture capitalist in information and communications technology sought EB-2 NIW classification. Proposed to provide consulting and training services. AAO dismissed, finding proposed work lacks national importance under Dhanasar first prong; services too limited to company clientele without substantial economic benefit.

A marketing manager sought NIW under EB-2. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed the first prong of Dhanasar: the specific proposed endeavor lacked national importance. While marketing management is important generally, his particular services showed no demonstrated substantial economic impact or job creation potential.

Legal analyst sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Director found advanced degree qualification and substantial merit but denied waiver, finding no national importance. AAO affirmed, holding specific endeavor lacks broader implications beyond immediate employer and clients.

Project manager sought EB-2 advanced degree and exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate advanced degree (insufficient post-baccalaureate experience) and did not meet three exceptional ability criteria, making NIW analysis moot.

Business operations specialist claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, meeting two of ten criteria initially: leading role and high salary. On appeal, claimed published material criterion but AAO found translations inaccurate and uncertified. AAO dismissed, finding insufficient evidence of acclaim or top-tier status despite meeting two criteria.

An admissions and marketing director sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO found he met the advanced degree requirement but dismissed the appeal because his proposed work in higher education admissions lacked demonstrated national importance or substantial economic impact as required under Dhanasar's first prong.

Business development manager with advanced degree sought NIW for EB-2 proposing sales strategy development in cybersecurity and IT. AAO found substantial merit but dismissed because proposed work lacked broader implications for the industry or economy at level of national importance.

Self-petitioner chief executive proposing to operate a domestic animal services company. Claimed national interest waiver under Dhanasar framework. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance; no evidence of prospective impact beyond the business itself or substantial economic effects for the nation.