Published AAO appeal decisions

AI robotics entrepreneur claims EB-2 exceptional ability. Petitioner meets advanced degree criterion but fails to meet three of six exceptional ability criteria required for classification. Bachelor's degree in aeronautics not demonstrated to relate to robotics endeavor. Comparable evidence for remaining criteria insufficient. Categorical ineligibility established; NIW not reached.

Graduate research assistant in cybersecurity sought EB-2 with NIW for autonomous vehicle security research. AAO found substantial merit but dismissed because petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor or demonstrate being well-positioned to advance it under Dhanasar framework.

AI algorithm developer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for U.S. work. SCOPS found substantial merit and national importance but concluded insufficient evidence of qualification to advance endeavor and that waiver would benefit U.S. AAO remanded because petitioner's employment circumstances changed materially since filing; clarification needed on how endeavor will be pursued.

Industrial engineer with Ph.D. seeking EB-2 NIW for developing advanced three-dimensional AI chips. Qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed first Dhanasar prong: proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated substantial merit and national importance. AAO affirmed denial without reaching remaining prongs.

A cloud engineer sought extraordinary ability classification through five criteria. The AAO affirmed that she met only two criteria (judging and scholarly articles), did not meet the threshold of three required criteria, and lacked demonstrated sustained acclaim for the elite classification.

A life sciences and digital solutions executive met three initial EB-1A criteria but failed the final merits determination. The AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work to demonstrate extraordinary ability in the field.

Computer security researcher sought EB-2 NIW to continue research on software security tools for consumer devices and services. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance; evidence focused on petitioner's qualifications and field importance rather than proposed endeavor's prospective impact beyond employer.

AI researcher sought EB-2 NIW classification claiming exceptional ability. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met only two of three required criteria for exceptional ability: official academic record and professional association membership, but not recognition for achievements and significant contributions in AI field.

Cloud engineer specializing in supply chain management and computing seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO withdrew SCOPS findings on published material and salary criteria as unsupported, remanded for reconsideration of awards, judging, and original contributions criteria, and full final merits analysis of totality of evidence.

Business professional in financial technology seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met only one required criterion (leading critical role) out of three needed; original contributions lacked major significance and salary was not substantially higher than comparable positions.

Industrial engineering doctoral student and researcher seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to continue research on graph neural networks for environmental monitoring and real-time video processing. AAO found endeavor nationally important but petitioner lacked PhD-level credentials, demonstrated record of success in the field, concrete plan, or progress toward the specific endeavor; appeal dismissed.

Ph.D. student in computer science pursuing generative AI research sought NIW under Dhanasar. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but petitioner failed second prong: insufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance research through citations, progress, or field recognition.

A researcher and assistant professor sought NIW for EB-2 under Dhanasar. The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded the petitioner was not well-positioned to advance it, lacking demonstrated influence, institutional support, or feasible funding for research plans.

Senior security researcher seeks NIW for cybersecurity innovations. AAO dismissed finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; work benefits only specific employers and clients without broader field or national security implications.

Cybersecurity engineer employed as head of detection engineering sought EB-1A classification. Met initial three criteria: judging, scholarly articles, leading role, and high salary. However, final merits analysis found insufficient sustained national or international acclaim to demonstrate extraordinary ability at top percentage level.

Chief technology officer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met only two of ten evidentiary criteria after multiple appeals. AAO dismissed motion to reopen and reconsider, finding petitioner failed to establish three required criteria and did not identify legal errors in prior decisions.