Published AAO appeal decisions

A medical researcher with advanced degrees in pulmonary medicine sought NIW classification to continue research on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and asthma therapeutics. The AAO reversed the service center's denial, finding the proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner is well positioned to advance it, and waiving the job offer would benefit the United States.

A scientific researcher sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed a combined motion to reopen and reconsider because the petitioner failed to submit new facts or identify deficiencies in the prior dismissal; resubmitted evidence previously rejected and could not consider post-petition publications.

Medical researcher with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2. AAO held proposed research has substantial merit and national importance but petitioner not well positioned to advance it, lacking documented plan, prior success in similar efforts, or evidence of led funded research projects.

A researcher with a doctoral degree sought a national interest waiver for an EB-2 petition proposing work on substance use disorder treatment. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of her proposed endeavor despite working in an important field, lacking specific independent evidence comparable to expert letters required.

A postdoctoral researcher in plant genetics sought EB-2 NIW classification through self-petition. The applicant demonstrated all three Dhanasar prongs: the research on plant resistance has national importance, the researcher has proven expertise and track record, and the U.S. benefits from the advanced STEM work. The appeal was sustained.

Clinical research scientist in neurology sought EB-2 NIW for COVID-19 related research. SCOPS found substantial merit but not national importance; AAO affirmed. Petitioner failed to show how her specific proposed endeavor would have broader implications or significant prospective impact distinct from general field importance.

A postdoctoral researcher self-petitioned for NIW seeking EB-2 as individual with advanced degree. She proposed researching immunological reactions to kidney transplantation. The AAO found the endeavor had national importance but dismissed because prior publications in unrelated medical fields did not establish she was well positioned to advance this specific research area.

Physician with cardio-oncology research proposed advancing treatment of cardiovascular diseases in cancer patients. AAO found research met national importance but his published work lacked evidence of driving field progress or generating relevant party interest, failing the well-positioned prong.

Neuroscience researcher with Ph.D. seeks EB-2 self-petition with NIW for research on Alzheimer's and ataxia mechanisms using stem cells. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs met: research has national importance with broader implications, petitioner well-positioned with advanced degree and track record, and waiver benefits U.S. given urgent medical need.

A microbiologist with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for genetic research on foodborne pathogens and antimicrobial resistance. The AAO affirmed he met the first two Dhanasar prongs but dismissed because he failed to establish the national interest in his contributions was urgent enough to justify waiving labor certification requirements.

A medical researcher in microbiology and parasitology sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner claimed four criteria. The AAO found original contributions and leading/critical role not met due to insufficient evidence of major field-wide significance and distinguished role. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet the three-criterion threshold.

Toxicologist sponsored by employer for research in health and safety risk assessment sought national interest waiver. AAO found endeavor had merit and beneficiary well positioned, but waiver not warranted because labor certification was not shown impractical and no urgent national interest was demonstrated.

Forensic DNA technologist seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner claimed her work aligns with Justice for All Act and addresses DNA testing availability. AAO found the specific proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it extends only to employer's clients and courtroom testimony, not her field broadly.

A geoscientist and volcanology researcher pursuing doctoral degrees seeks extraordinary ability classification. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding the petitioner met five initial criteria and demonstrating through aggregate evidence sustained national or international acclaim, field recognition, and placement among the very top of the volcanology field.

Laboratory supervisor sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to conduct immunological research for drug development. AAO held petitioner not well-positioned to advance proposed endeavor; research publications and praise insufficient without concrete evidence of past success or funded future projects.

Biomedical researcher seeks EB-1A classification in sciences. Petitioner claimed at least three criteria including awards and membership. AAO found two criteria met by service center but affirmed neither award criterion nor membership was properly established, and concluded no sustained acclaim or top-tier recognition demonstrated.

A molecular scientist seeks an EB-2 NIW to continue research on protein interactions for neurodegenerative disease therapies. The AAO dismissed, finding the endeavor meritorious but the applicant not well-positioned to advance it independently without demonstrated funding responsibility or sustained stakeholder interest.

A postdoctoral research scientist in regenerative medicine sought EB-1A classification. The AAO dismissed because she met only one of three required criteria: judging lacked specificity and original contributions lacked evidence of major significance to the overall field.

Postdoctoral biomedical researcher studying glioblastoma treatment claimed extraordinary ability through publications, peer review, and citations. AAO upheld meeting two criteria (judging, scholarly articles) but rejected major contributions criterion because evidence showed significant work without demonstrating major significance to field. Final merits finding: not at top of field.

A mechanical engineering doctoral student sought an EB-2 national interest waiver to develop computational models and digital twins for personalized medicine. The AAO found the endeavor met the first prong but dismissed because the petitioner lacked sufficient evidence of research success, clinical impact, or interest from relevant parties to show she was well positioned to advance it.