Published AAO appeal decisions

A heating oil company petitioned for a radio announcer and marketing manager under O-1. The petition was amended during processing from the business category to the arts category, so it is O-1B rather than O-1A. The AAO found the published-material criterion unmet, so the three-criteria threshold failed and the appeal was dismissed.

Marketing professional with Brazilian tourism experience seeks national interest waiver for EB-2. Petitioner initially proposed general marketing work, then introduced new business plan at RFE stage. AAO found impermissible material change and held original endeavor lacks national importance. Work would not impact field or economy beyond specific employer clientele.

Marketing manager with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Director found advanced degree eligibility established. AAO affirmed denial, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance; no evidence of projected economic impact or job creation at national level.

A marketing professional with tourism and hotel management degree sought an EB-2 national interest waiver to start and manage her own tourism business. The AAO affirmed denial, finding her proposed endeavor lacked national importance because it would serve only specific clients without broader economic impact, and she was not well positioned to advance it.

Event producer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met initial evidentiary criteria but AAO found evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or position among top event producers. Single media mention and isolated judging instance do not establish required level of achievement.

Self-petitioner, social communications specialist providing marketing consultancy, sought EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver. AAO found proposed marketing endeavor lacks national importance and cannot establish waiver eligibility. Appeal dismissed.

Public relations director sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed six criteria including awards, membership, and original contributions. AAO held she failed to meet at least three criteria: awards were organizational not individual, and membership evidence lacked required bylaws documentation.

A city branding expert sought extraordinary ability classification, and the petition was denied with a finding of willful misrepresentation. The petitioner then filed an untimely combined motion that was dismissed. The AAO dismissed the appeal, reviewing only the motion dismissal, because no reasonable justification for the late filing was shown. No criteria were decided.

Employer-sponsored public relations manager with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish national importance under Dhanasar; her proposed work was limited to specific employers and clients without broader economic or field-level impact.

Media and marketing professional with LLC startup sought NIW for EB-2 classification. Proposed marketing services and training workshops for clients. AAO affirmed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; proposed work benefits specific clients and trainees without broader impact on advertising or marketing field. First prong failed.

A producer and journalist from Venezuela seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability claimed six criteria. The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that she met two (judging, artistic display) but rejected four others (awards, membership, published material, leading role) and concluded her work in local media did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for the top tier.

A marketing and communications professional claimed seven initial criteria for extraordinary ability but failed to submit a required appellate brief identifying specific errors in the four-page denial decision. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal for lack of specificity, as petitioner made only general assertions without identifying contradictory evidence or explaining how evidence overcame stated grounds for denial.

A marketing manager with an advanced degree sought a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the service center's favorable first-prong finding, concluding the proposed marketing services lacked national importance because the benefit was limited to employers and clients, with no shown broader or economic impact. Later prongs were not reached and the appeal was dismissed.

A public relations specialist sought NIW classification for an endeavor involving corporate communications consulting and university teaching in strategic communications. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong despite possessing substantial merit.

A video journalist sought extraordinary ability classification on his own behalf, claiming several evidentiary criteria. The AAO agreed that the awards and judging criteria were met but found membership, published material, exhibitions and leading role unmet. Overall, the evidence did not show sustained acclaim, so the appeal was dismissed.

Marketing manager employed by U.S. organization seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Claimed substantial merit for strategic marketing work. Advanced degree established but failed first Dhanasar prong: proposed work lacked national importance beyond specific employer and clients. Appeal dismissed.

Sports journalist employed at major television networks initially claimed seven criteria. AAO found published material and high salary met but rejected original contributions, display, and critical role claims. Decision sustained dismissal based on lack of sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Public relations professional with nearly twenty years in media and senior international roles sought extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner established three criteria at threshold and presented additional published materials evidence. AAO found petitioner demonstrated sustained national and international acclaim and achieved career of acclaimed work in field, qualifying as among small percentage at top.

A journalist specializing in railway coverage appealed EB-1A denial. Although Director found six criteria met, AAO withdrew four findings: the award lacked national recognition, published materials were about swimming not journalism, judging role was in unrelated field, and book launch was commercial not artistic. Final merits test failed.

A journalist and sub-editor sought extraordinary ability classification, initially claiming all ten criteria. The director found only judging met. The AAO dismissed the appeal, concluding the petitioner satisfied only one criterion because awards, memberships, media coverage, articles and role were not adequately shown, and sustained acclaim was not demonstrated.

Sales and marketing officer seeks NIW and exceptional ability classification. AAO found he does not qualify as advanced degree professional and lacks three exceptional ability criteria. Appeal dismissed because proposed marketing work lacks demonstrated national importance.

Marketing manager sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Qualified as advanced degree professional but failed Dhanasar test: proposed marketing work benefited only employer, lacking documented broader field implications or substantial economic benefits needed for national importance.

An IT marketing professional sought EB-2 national interest waiver classification. The petitioner argued her marketing and consulting work had national importance under Dhanasar. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the specific endeavor lacked sufficient national importance or projected economic impact, and did not analyze the remaining Dhanasar prongs.

A chief marketing officer sought extraordinary ability classification, and the service center found only two of ten criteria met. While the appeal was pending, a later petition for the same classification was approved. The AAO dismissed the appeal as moot, also because the petitioner ignored its notice of intent to dismiss.

Marketing manager in OTT South Asian television sought EB-1A as individual of extraordinary ability. Claimed five criteria; director found only one met. AAO reversed director's leading role finding and found no other criteria satisfied. Narrowly defined field and insufficient evidence of national or international acclaim.