Published AAO appeal decisions

Gymnastics coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed five criteria; AAO found only judging criterion met. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to establish three required criteria and lacks sustained national or international acclaim at top of field.

Sports industry professional sought EB-2 NIW for business venture. AAO dismissed appeal, finding no demonstrated national importance under Dhanasar's first prong. Petitioner conflated industry importance with specific endeavor impact; failed to show company would operate at national scale or generate substantial economic effects.

A youth soccer league employer-petitioning for EB-1A extraordinary ability for a soccer coach beneficiary. Claimed five evidentiary criteria; none met. Record lacks personal awards, qualifying membership evidence, and published material in major outlets. AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national acclaim or upper-echelon status required for extraordinary ability.

Brazilian jiu-jitsu competitor seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to meet major award criterion and could not satisfy three initial criteria. Tournament awards in Master division lack sufficient context and do not demonstrate excellence. No final merits analysis reached.

Long-distance runner sought EB-1A classification claiming extraordinary ability. AAO dismissed appeal finding one criterion met but aggregate evidence insufficient; runner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or position among small percentage at field top.

Downhill longboard athlete from Argentina sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO held petitioner met only one of five claimed evidentiary criteria. Lacking sustained national or international acclaim and recent competitive record, petitioner fails final merits step.

Martial arts entrepreneur and instructor sought NIW for business and training enterprise. AAO held substantial merit was met but national importance was not; no evidence of field or economy impact beyond direct clients, and business projections lacked adequate evidentiary support.

A Brazilian jiu-jitsu athlete seeks EB-1A classification for extraordinary ability. Though three criteria were met (awards, judging, exhibitions), the AAO found the totality of evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or place among the very top of the field.

A martial arts instructor claimed three EB-1A criteria: association membership, published material, and leading roles. The AAO found membership did not satisfy regulatory requirements, and with only three criteria claimed, failure of one prevented reaching the minimum threshold. Appeal dismissed without final merits analysis.

Commercial pilot sought EB-2 classification as individual of exceptional ability and NIW. Director found petitioner met four of six exceptional ability criteria; AAO found actual membership in professional associations not established and training certificates showed completion, not exceptional expertise. Appeal dismissed on both exceptional ability and NIW grounds.

Jiu-jitsu athlete seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met lesser awards criterion but failed to establish three alternate regulatory criteria. Publications did not meet major media standard; training program lacked evidence of broader impact or major significance. Dismissed for insufficient criteria.

Airline pilot sought EB-2 as individual of exceptional ability with national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner met four of six initial criteria but dismissed appeal on final merits, concluding evidence did not establish degree of expertise significantly above ordinarily encountered in field.

Squash professional petitioned by club for O-1A visa. Service center denied for failing to meet evidentiary criteria. Petitioner's appeal dismissed summarily for lack of specificity. Motions to reopen and reconsider dismissed because petitioner provided no new facts or evidence, and appellant brief was not properly filed with AAO.

A pole fitness performer claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, meeting awards criterion initially but failing at final merits. The AAO withdrew the awards finding, determining competitions lacked national recognition and that the performer failed to demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among the very top in her field.

An airline pilot sought EB-2 classification as exceptional ability and NIW waiver. The AAO found the petitioner failed to satisfy at least three evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability and did not establish that the proposed endeavor of working as a commercial airline pilot had national importance. Appeal dismissed.

The beneficiary is a boxer and trainer for whom an agent sought O-1A classification. The petitioner claimed membership, original contributions through comparable evidence, and high salary. The AAO dismissed the appeal because membership and contributions were not established, so three criteria were not satisfied, and it reserved the final merits.

Aquatic coach and instructor claiming EB-1A extraordinary ability in athletics. AAO affirmed denial, finding applicant failed to satisfy three required alternate criteria and lacks sustained national or international acclaim demonstrating extraordinary ability among the very top of field.

Physical fitness specialist and entrepreneur sought NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite substantial merit; benefits limited to client base without broader impact on physical fitness field or obesity prevention at national level.

Fitness trainer and amateur bodybuilder sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed director's finding that petitioner met no evidentiary criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim required for top percentile designation.

A security manager and fitness trainer claiming EB-1A extraordinary ability satisfied only one criterion (judging); failed to establish three or more required. AAO dismissed, finding insufficient evidence of national or international acclaim.

A triathlete seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner satisfied only two of ten required evidentiary criteria: published materials and awards. She did not establish membership in elite associations or critical roles, and failed to demonstrate sustained national acclaim placing her in the small percentage at the very top of triathlon.

Entrepreneur and jiu-jitsu instructor sought NIW as exceptional ability professional. AAO found petitioner met only two of six exceptional ability criteria, failing underlying EB-2 qualification. Because ineligible for EB-2, NIW analysis not reached. Appeal dismissed.

A Colombian pilot claimed exceptional ability under EB-2 and a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the Director's finding that he met the licensing and professional association criteria, and found his overall expertise did not exceed ordinary pilot competency. The waiver claim was not addressed.

A taekwondo instructor and athlete sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found he met the judging criterion but not the awards or membership criteria, and overall did not demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Commercial pilot sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO held petitioner lacked requisite advanced degree or bachelor's degree equivalent and failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed work as pilot and instructor, lacking evidence of industry-wide impact.