Published AAO appeal decisions

Biomedical scientist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for genetic research on medical conditions. AAO found petitioner failed to establish advanced degree eligibility due to translation deficiencies and did not demonstrate national importance of proposed endeavor, lacking specific prospective impact evidence.

An entrepreneur and training specialist sought an NIW after obtaining an advanced degree. The appeal was dismissed as moot because the petitioner obtained permanent resident status through an approved petition before the AAO decision.

Software engineer proposed AI and machine learning voice biometrics authentication system as self-petitioner for national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because the specific endeavor lacked sufficient national importance, finding alignment with government initiatives and field importance alone insufficient without concrete economic impact projections.

An airline pilot sought NIW for EB-2 to work as a pilot and flight instructor. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; the petitioner conflated the general importance of the aviation industry with a specific, nationally significant undertaking and did not explain how his work would positively impact the economy on a broad scale.

An aircraft mechanic and technician sought EB-2 classification based on exceptional ability together with a national interest waiver. The appeal was dismissed because, although three initial criteria were met, he did not show expertise significantly above that of others in the field; the waiver was not reached.

A postdoctoral researcher in plant genetics sought EB-2 NIW classification through self-petition. The applicant demonstrated all three Dhanasar prongs: the research on plant resistance has national importance, the researcher has proven expertise and track record, and the U.S. benefits from the advanced STEM work. The appeal was sustained.

Engineer and researcher in clinical tissue engineering and transplantation seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver. AAO affirmed that petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance proposed endeavor; education and publications insufficient without demonstrated record of success.

An avant-garde pop artist sought NIW for EB-2. The AAO found she met exceptional ability criteria but dismissed because her proposed endeavor lacks national importance. Expert letters discussing art's general value did not demonstrate how her specific work would benefit the U.S. economy or employment.

A biomedical aesthetician and entrepreneur with an advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW classification to establish an aesthetic clinic offering non-surgical treatments and professional development. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the endeavor lacked national importance as merely operating in an important field or addressing industry shortages is insufficient without evidence of broader field or societal impact.

Industrial engineer and entrepreneur proposed engineering consulting business in Florida focused on sustainability and efficiency. Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance despite sustainability framework; modest employment projections and vague project specifics lacked evidence of broader impact.

Science and chemistry teacher sought EB-2 NIW claiming endeavor to advance STEM education. AAO affirmed denial, holding classroom teaching activities, while meritorious, lack demonstrated impact on STEM education field broadly; importance of STEM field and teacher shortage insufficient without specific evidence of proposed endeavor national importance. Second and third prongs reserved.

A telecommunications engineer seeking EB-2 classification with national interest waiver claimed his endeavor would involve the BEAD broadband program. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and detail about what activities he actually intended to undertake, making it impossible to assess national importance.

Employer sponsored beneficiary for EB-2 national interest waiver in product analytics using AI and machine learning. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance claim, holding that working in STEM or shortage occupations alone insufficient without broader prospective impacts to national economy.

Market researcher sought EB-2 NIW, claiming proposed market research endeavor would benefit industry and public via peer-reviewed publications. AAO found no evidence of national importance; the endeavor's effects would be confined to employer and clients, lacking broader implications required by Dhanasar.

An educator sought EB-2 national interest waiver for her proposed endeavor in education. The AAO dismissed her fifth motion to reopen, finding no new facts warranting reconsideration of the prior denial that her specific educational endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance despite general field importance.

Finance executive with advanced degree sought national interest waiver as EB-2. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance for proposed finance role. AAO dismissed motion, finding petitioner reargued prior issues without new evidence or legal error and did not meet first prong.

Physical therapist filed second motion to reconsider denied NIW petition. Petitioner reargued eligibility without demonstrating misapplication of law or policy. AAO confirmed prior dismissal, holding that field importance and worker shortage do not establish endeavor's national importance. Motion dismissed.

Accountant and financial audit expert with advanced degree sought national interest waiver but failed first Dhanasar prong; submitted articles on accounting field and support letters praising past work, but none established national importance of her specific proposed financial analysis and reporting endeavor.

Music instructor and musician claims national interest waiver for EB-2 immigration. Proposed endeavor to improve representation of diverse identities in orchestral music through teaching and research was found to have substantial merit but lack the national importance required under Dhanasar because impact was limited to local students and lacked broader field implications.

Lead data engineer: employer-sponsored EB-2 with national interest waiver claim. Petitioner asserted cloud computing and AI work had national importance. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national or global implications and benefited only specific employer; first prong failed.

A dentist sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO confirmed EB-2 eligibility but dismissed the appeal under Dhanasar framework, finding the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance. Services to individual patients and general professional shortage do not constitute nationally significant impact.

Military chaplain with advanced degree sought NIW for proposed endeavor addressing servicemember suicide and extremism. AAO affirmed dismissal because the endeavor lacks national importance; impact confined to individuals receiving services, not the broader field or national interest.

An advanced manufacturing engineer seeks EB-2 with NIW. The AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the petitioner did not adequately demonstrate national importance of the specific endeavor. The decision remanded for the director to reconsider the third prong using STEM-field guidance from policy manual.

A pharmacist and consultant sought a waiver to create a counseling platform addressing prescription medication misuse. She possessed an advanced degree qualifying for EB-2. The AAO dismissed the appeal because her proposed endeavor lacks national importance, with benefits limited to individual platform users rather than demonstrating substantial positive economic effects or industry-wide impact.

IT specialist specializing in national security sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for an endeavor to improve digital security and IT management practices across U.S. sectors. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner's expertise and past accomplishments do not establish the proposed endeavor's national importance; the work would not sufficiently impact the field beyond prospective customers.