Published AAO appeal decisions

An early childhood educator and behavioral counselor with master's degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for consulting business training educators in underserved communities. The AAO dismissed, holding that the proposed endeavor lacks national importance; working in an important field, addressing labor shortages, or providing regional services does not establish prospective impact at a national level.

A lawyer and legal entrepreneur in self-petitioner status sought EB-2 with NIW. The applicant claimed substantial merit and national importance for a legal practice advising startups and cybersecurity. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance: the business plan lacked specificity about economic impact, job creation, or projected benefits; merely working in an important field is insufficient.

Security engineer with advanced degree claimed national interest waiver for proposed cloud security research. AAO upheld denial, finding the specific endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance and presented material changes to initial proposal without clear prospective impact beyond the employer.

Sales division manager and technical advisor sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver under Dhanasar framework. AAO issued notice of intent to dismiss and instructed response within thirty-three days. Petitioner failed to respond within required timeframe; appeal dismissed as abandoned.

A mechanical engineer with a Ph.D. sought an NIW to pursue advanced manufacturing research for healthcare devices. The AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but concluded the petitioner did not demonstrate being well positioned to advance it, as education and publication citations alone do not show sufficient record of success.

Biomedical scientist with Ph.D. sought NIW for postdoctoral research on nanomembranes for cancer treatment. AAO found substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well-positioned to advance the endeavor through lack of sustained funding, clear research plan, or stakeholder interest.

A systems engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a proposed business providing supply chain management consulting to industrial and commercial companies. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established exceptional ability but failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific business endeavor despite showing industry importance.

Esthetician who operates beauty clinic and school in Brazil seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met only one criterion; failed three others required for advancement to final merits. AAO dismissed appeal, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim.

A prospective management consultant seeks EB-2 national interest waiver to establish a small consultancy for businesses. The AAO affirmed denial because the proposed venture, though economically sound locally, lacks national importance; it does not demonstrate impact beyond the immediate community or region required for a waiver.

Software developer with advanced degree sought national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed software development lacked national importance; generalized publications about cybersecurity importance, vague hiring projections, and absence of documented specific endeavor impact insufficient.

Logistics management consultant sought EB-2 exceptional ability and NIW. AAO affirmed that petitioner failed to satisfy required exceptional ability criteria: academic record not related to field, insufficient salary evidence, only 8 years 8 months experience not 10 years required, and no professional license. Ineligible for underlying classification; NIW prongs not reached.

A solar energy entrepreneur with business degree and twelve years in renewable energy seeks NIW of job requirement. Service center denied underlying EB-2 classification without adequate explanation or RFE. AAO remanded for proper evaluation of whether advanced degree professional status and NIW eligibility were satisfied, finding denial insufficiently reasoned.

Tax auditor seeking NIW for EB-2 exceptional ability classification claimed multiple criteria. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner met only academic record and experience criteria but failed to satisfy exceptional ability threshold; waiver analysis not reached due to underlying ineligibility.

Semiconductor operations project manager with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW. AAO affirmed denial, finding proposed endeavor to innovate chip testing lacks demonstrated national importance. Professional experience and industry importance insufficient; no evidence of broader sectoral or economic impact.

Senior engineer in AI research seeking NIW under Dhanasar framework for continued research on safe, autonomous AI systems. Service center's denial lacked complete analysis of evidence, made contradictory statements, and failed to address all arguments. Remanded for proper application of all three Dhanasar prongs with complete evidentiary analysis.

An airplane pilot sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a proposed aviation training business in Florida. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. The business plan lacked specifics on wages, worker numbers, location, and how the endeavor would have broader implications beyond the aviation industry.

Pharmacist and entrepreneur self-petitioner seeking NIW for pharmaceutical consulting firm in Florida. Claimed national importance through human capital development and healthcare competitiveness. AAO held endeavor lacks broader implications; applicant's expertise and qualifications misplaced in first prong analysis focused on specific endeavor.

Research scientist with master's degree in electrical and computer engineering proposed to advance privacy-preserving IoT technology. AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded petitioner lacks concrete steps toward employment or demonstrated feasibility, failing the second Dhanasar prong.

Squash coach who competed as junior player claimed four evidentiary criteria on appeal. AAO found only membership and critical role met, with one criterion established on appeal. Final merits determination found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or status among very top of field.

A nonprofit foundation sought EB-2 classification for a safety and health specialist based on advanced degree. The AAO affirmed denial because the foundation failed to demonstrate ability to pay the proffered wage from tax returns, and a co-executive director's personal commitment to fund the position was insufficient.

A computer scientist proposed developing machine learning algorithms for precision medicine and drug discovery. Although the AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, it affirmed the service center's finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the research, lacking comparable evidence to established precedent.

A professor seeks EB-1A visa. Appeal dismissed because petitioner satisfied only one of required three initial evidentiary criteria. Published material and artistic display criteria were not demonstrated; leading role criterion was not reached. Petitioner lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim.

Entrepreneur and fitness trainer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver to lead corporate wellness company optimizing employer fitness programs. AAO dismissed because proposed endeavor lacks national importance; business projections and HUBZone location do not demonstrate broader economic impact or field implications.

IT professional petitioner sought NIW for proposed cybersecurity consulting and training company. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding petitioner failed Dhanasar first prong: national importance lacks evidentiary support. Twelve-employee projection, general industry talent shortage, and letters insufficient to show substantial prospective impact. Second and third prongs reserved.

A robotics educator seeks EB-2 classification to develop a STEM education model teaching applied robotics to vulnerable youth. AAO held the petitioner failed to meet exceptional ability requirements, satisfying only two of ten criteria, and did not reach the national interest waiver analysis.