Published AAO appeal decisions

A professional soccer player sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming five criteria. The AAO found awards and published material met, rejected original contributions and high salary, and sustained leading role. With three criteria satisfied, the case was remanded for a final merits analysis of sustained national or international acclaim.

An embossing artist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The service center found two criteria met: judging and display. On appeal, the petitioner claimed four additional criteria but the AAO rejected awards, published materials, and original contributions for lack of specificity and documentation. With only two criteria met, the appeal was dismissed.

A dog sled racer sought extraordinary ability classification based on multiple World Cup medals claimed as top prizes in her field. The AAO rejected the motion to reconsider, holding that World Cup medals lack sufficient public recognition beyond the sport's governing body to constitute major internationally recognized awards.

An electrical engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO found petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate that the specific proposed endeavor of providing engineering services had national importance under the Dhanasar framework. Lacking prospective impact evidence, the petition was dismissed without reaching remaining prongs.

A civil engineer with a master's degree in civil engineering sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO agreed he qualified as an advanced degree professional but remanded the case because SCOPS made contradictory statements on national importance and provided no analysis for the well-positioned prong, denying him fair notice.

Entrepreneur claimed nine EB-1A criteria but met only two, short of three required. AAO withdrew contradictory SCOPS findings on awards and membership, rejected published material claim, but found petitioner met the threshold. Matter remanded for final merits determination on whether evidence shows sustained acclaim and top-tier status.

A water polo player claimed four EB-1A criteria but satisfied only one. AAO affirmed dismissal, finding no major award, insufficient criteria met, and no evidence of the extraordinary sustained acclaim required for EB-1A classification at the sport's highest level.

A civil engineer researcher seeks NIW for EB-2 to continue research on earthquake-resistant geotechnical systems in the U.S. AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; no evidence showed broader implications for related industries or nationally significant STEM advancement.

Consultant and entrepreneur proposed establishing consulting company serving SMEs. AAO held the endeavor lacks national importance because petitioner showed only direct client benefits and failed to demonstrate broader field impact at level required by Dhanasar.

An engineering corporation sponsored a cost and project controls engineer for EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO upheld the denial, finding the specific endeavor lacked national importance despite work on school district capital projects, as it showed no broader field or economic impact beyond individual projects.

Oracle technical consultant seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree petition. Petitioner qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed to establish endeavor's national importance; company would benefit individual clients and SMBs without demonstrating broader field, regional, or national impact required by Dhanasar.

An insurance company executive sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a proposed life insurance company. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the applicant failed to establish national importance of the specific endeavor, and declined to reach the remaining Dhanasar prongs.

A business consultant mentoring immigrant entrepreneurs claimed extraordinary ability. The AAO found he did not meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria and, alternatively, that he failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and place among the very top of his field.

Environmental engineer claimed six criteria for extraordinary ability. AAO affirmed judging and scholarly articles criteria but rejected membership, published material, and original contributions. No evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status required for EB-1A classification.

A health promoter with twelve years experience sought NIW as EB-2 member of professions. AAO dismissed, finding proposed health promotion endeavor lacks national importance. Generic health promotion work does not demonstrate impact beyond a specific organization or extend broadly enough to affect the field at national level.

Self-petitioner teacher proposes English language instruction business in Florida targeting legal immigrant communities, claiming alignment with federal immigration priorities. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to establish national importance; addressing important social issue insufficient; no evidence of broader field impact, substantial economic effects, or nationwide job creation.

A real estate broker seeks extraordinary ability classification. She claimed membership and high salary criteria. The AAO affirmed denial because she did not receive a major award, did not meet three alternative criteria, and did not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for EB-1A.

Entrepreneur sought EB-2 national interest waiver for eco-friendly furniture manufacturing and consulting business. This is a second motion to reconsider a prior dismissal. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate the prior appellate decision misapplied Dhanasar framework; economic activity from the proposed endeavor remained too localized.

International development specialist with master's in law sought EB-2 with NIW for power sector finance projects. Service center acknowledged advanced degree eligibility. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked specificity and national importance; petitioner's accomplishments misdirected in first Dhanasar prong analysis. Appeal dismissed.

A restaurant petitioned to classify a mixologist as O-1A extraordinary ability. The petitioner initially claimed O-1A (sciences, education, business, athletics) but later argued mixology is O-1B (arts). The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petition was filed under O-1A, which does not cover arts; the petitioner cannot change classifications mid-process and must satisfy the category claimed at filing.

A business executive in the pomegranate industry sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed motions to reopen and reconsider, finding the petitioner failed to establish three required criteria on published material and high salary, and did not meet the initial evidentiary threshold.

An entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with NIW. The AAO upheld dismissal because she failed to meet three of six exceptional ability criteria (no qualifying license, insufficient years of experience, insufficient salary, no professional membership). The NIW merits were not addressed.

Co-founder and CEO of financial technology company claiming extraordinary ability through lesser awards, memberships, published materials, and leadership role. AAO found awards criterion not met because award belonged to employer; membership criterion not met because petitioner failed to demonstrate it applies; and overall record lacks evidence of sustained acclaim among the very top of the field.

A medical researcher with advanced degrees in pulmonary medicine sought NIW classification to continue research on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and asthma therapeutics. The AAO reversed the service center's denial, finding the proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner is well positioned to advance it, and waiving the job offer would benefit the United States.

A research scientist self-petitioned for EB-2 national interest waiver based on her proposed machine learning and single-cell RNA research. The AAO dismissed because the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond the importance of the field itself. The record provided only generalized information and publication citations unrelated to the specific endeavor's broader impact.