Published AAO appeal decisions

A social and community service manager and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish that her proposed endeavor had national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, focusing on broader prospective impact rather than industry or profession importance.

Senior software engineer for digital entertainment company seeks EB-2 with NIW. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to show national importance. Decision held that work maintaining secure payment platforms for single company, despite STEM context and field importance, lacks prospective impact of national significance.

Paralegal seeks EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner did not establish exceptional ability, meeting only two of six required criteria. Failure to qualify for underlying EB-2 classification rendered NIW analysis unnecessary.

Data scientist seeking NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because proposed endeavor lacks national importance; while substantial merit established, petitioner's work benefits only current employer with no demonstration of innovations or impact extending beyond employer's business interests or clients.

Machine learning engineer employed at social media company seeking NIW for EB-2. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite working in valuable AI field; petitioner's specific work on user engagement lacks broader implications. Appeal dismissed.

An engineer with a master's degree sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for research on enhancing concrete strength using wastewater byproducts. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance: it remains confined to a single employer with no demonstrated broader implications for the field or nation.

A karate coach claimed extraordinary ability and sought to open karate schools in the United States. The AAO confirmed he met two criteria—judging and leading role—but dismissed because he failed to meet the minimum three-criterion threshold required for final merits consideration.

Contact center entrepreneur seeks NIW to operate call center service provider. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner did not establish national importance of proposed endeavor. While services may benefit government clients, they lack innovation or evidence of broader industry impact or economic significance beyond company and direct clients.

Neuroscience researcher with Ph.D. seeks EB-2 self-petition with NIW for research on Alzheimer's and ataxia mechanisms using stem cells. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs met: research has national importance with broader implications, petitioner well-positioned with advanced degree and track record, and waiver benefits U.S. given urgent medical need.

A basketball coach, formerly a player, sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Though three initial criteria were facially satisfied as a player, evidence lacked sustained national or international acclaim as a coach. Coaching career began post-filing; sparsely documented coaching does not demonstrate top-level recognition. AAO dismissed.

A network security architect employed by an IT services company sought EB-2 NIW classification. The petitioner proposed developing network architecture solutions addressing cyber threats but failed to establish national importance. The AAO held that personal expertise and industry significance do not substitute for demonstrating the specific endeavor's prospective national impact.

Automobile company petitioned for enterprise connectivity systems engineer beneficiary with master's degree, EB-2 advanced degree professional with NIW. AAO upheld denial, finding proposed work lacks national importance beyond employer; focused on specific endeavor, not field importance.

A telecommunications CEO and entrepreneur sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver, planning a company to deploy telecom infrastructure in rural and underserved areas. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the endeavor's benefits were too attenuated to show national importance, and it did not reach the other prongs.

A sales specialist and trainer claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A sought to satisfy four criteria: published material, original contributions, leading role, and high salary. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding published material and original contributions unsubstantiated and insufficient to meet the three-criterion minimum.

An attorney with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for providing international law consulting in foreign investment and trade. The AAO found the endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance as it would not sufficiently extend beyond the petitioner's clients to impact the field or economy broadly, thus failing the first Dhanasar prong.

Musician and teacher with advanced degree claimed an NIW for music education and cultural projects. AAO rejected the waiver because the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; teaching music individually, without demonstrated broad economic or sectoral impact, does not meet Dhanasar's threshold.

Electrical engineer proposing specialized consulting company seeking EB-2 with NIW. AAO affirmed underlying EB-2 eligibility but dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite focus on modernization and sustainability.

Logistics management consultant seeking EB-2 NIW for supply chain and trade consulting work. AAO dismissed appeal; petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance despite claims about supply chain resilience and Brazil trade relations, as projections showed only 15 employees versus industry baseline of 13.3 million.

A chief executive officer selling Italian furniture sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO held the petitioner failed to establish three required criteria: published material lacked proper documentation, judging of manufacturers was not in an allied field, original business contributions lacked demonstrated major significance, and scholarly articles were not authored by petitioner.

A product development manager and entrepreneur with advanced degree seeking EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. Abandoned initial proposed endeavor after RFE and presented alternative without sufficient development. AAO held inconsistent endeavor presentation prevented meaningful Dhanasar analysis and failed first prong requiring substantial merit and national importance.

A hockey athlete and coach appealed denial of EB-1A petition. The AAO withdrew SCOPS's decision that petitioner failed the judging criterion, finding evidence that she served as head referee. With three criteria met, the AAO remanded for SCOPS to conduct final merits analysis of sustained acclaim and top percentage standing.

An employer petitioned for an EB-2 national interest waiver for a strategic project manager. The AAO found the petitioner was not qualified as an advanced degree professional due to insufficient undergraduate credentials, and the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond the specific business and its clients. Appeal dismissed.

A biomedical researcher with a PhD in immunology sought EB-2 NIW classification for research on genome and protein engineering. The AAO agreed he met EB-2 requirements but found his specific proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite involving critical emerging technologies, as expert letters discussed his field generally, not his particular research.

A judo coach sought extraordinary ability classification. After the service center denial and a prior dismissed appeal, the petitioner filed combined motions to reopen and reconsider. The AAO dismissed both: new certificates postdated filing, the letter was unexplained, and no legal error in the earlier decision was shown.