Published AAO appeal decisions

Business strategist and developer claimed extraordinary ability in strategic brand management. AAO found evidence of talent but not sustained national or international acclaim or top-level status. Awards, publications, and influence claims all inadequately documented.

Orienteering athlete and trainer claimed extraordinary ability in athletics. AAO found team membership satisfied one criterion but past competitive achievements lacked sustained acclaim. No evidence of continued recognition in decade before filing.

A computer programmer, representing herself, sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, and the service center denied the petition. On appeal she stated generally that her background was not fully considered and promised a brief that never came. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal because no specific legal or factual error was identified.

Self-petitioner in athletics sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification based on karate victories and training. AAO found one criterion met but insufficient evidence of national or international sustained acclaim or top-tier status, dismissing appeal.

Self-petitioner former college athlete and runner sought EB-1A classification. AAO found collegiate awards insufficient for field of endeavor standard, published material not meeting criteria, and no sustained acclaim or evidence of continuing runner career.

Professional squash player in Africa claimed extraordinary ability. AAO found evidence of past competitive success but no sustained national or international acclaim, particularly after 2001. Coaching evidence and junior-level achievements insufficient for top-level classification.

Head horse trainer and jumper petitioner claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. AAO held petitioner failed to meet three regulatory criteria through objective evidence and instead relied excessively on expert letters. Achievements did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at very top level. Appeal dismissed.

The decision concerns an extraordinary ability petition denied by a service center for failing to show sustained acclaim. On appeal, the AAO dismissed the matter as moot because the petitioner had since become a lawful permanent resident. No criteria were analyzed and the occupation is not stated.

The decision concerns an extraordinary ability petition denied by a service center for failing to show sustained acclaim. On appeal, the AAO dismissed the matter as moot because the petitioner had since been granted lawful permanent residence. No criteria were analyzed and the occupation is not stated.

Dance professional and promoter sought EB-1A classification in arts. Claimed awards and membership criteria through scholarship, certificates, and dance troupe affiliation. AAO found these do not meet extraordinary ability standard. Overall record shows past talent but insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim at very top level.

An athlete sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification and was denied by the service center. The appeal offered only a general statement and no brief followed. Substitute counsel requested more time and a file copy, but failed to meet ineffective-assistance requirements or show good cause. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal for not identifying specific error.

A mass communications educator sought extraordinary ability classification in education. The director denied for lack of continued work in the field. The AAO upheld that, withdrew the director's favorable acclaim finding, and found the claimed criteria unmet and no showing of top-of-field standing, so the appeal was dismissed.

Photographer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO upheld director's denial, finding petitioner showed professional success and talent but failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim necessary for top-tier classification.

Biomedical researcher in sciences claimed extraordinary ability based on grants, memberships, contributions, and publications. AAO affirmed denial despite finding two criteria met, holding that meeting multiple criteria alone does not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for top of field.

Lacquer painter claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Petitioner submitted evidence of local award, association membership, and published materials. AAO found award lacked national or international recognition, membership did not require outstanding achievement, and published material was not primarily about petitioner or in major media. Appeal dismissed.

Self-petitioner painter sought extraordinary ability classification. Evidence included membership in Dokuritsu Art Association with national recognition requirements, exhibitions at Tokyo Art Museum and New York galleries, and published material. AAO found petitioner met three criteria, established sustained national acclaim, and showed plans to continue work in United States; petition approved.

A research scientist in the sciences sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed to meet awards, membership, and published material criteria through a pending patent, research grants, professional association membership, and citations to her work. The AAO found none of the criteria satisfied because the evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top level required.

A filmmaker in the arts sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed awards and critical role criteria through a Grand Prix award and acclaimed directorial and commissioning work. The AAO found the critical role criterion met but awards not met; meeting only one of three required criteria, the petition was denied.

A pediatric cardiac surgeon and founder of a nonprofit cardiac surgery foundation seeks EB-1A classification. He claimed at least three regulatory criteria were met. The AAO found he satisfied the criteria and established sustained national acclaim as one of the small percentage at the top of his field, and would continue his work in the United States.

A self-represented individual seeks EB-1A classification for extraordinary ability in a beauty-related field. He claimed awards, published material, judging experience, and scholarly articles. The AAO found none of the criteria met and concluded the evidence does not establish he has risen to the very top of his field.

Employer-sponsored petition for miniaturist artist claiming extraordinary ability through awards and exhibitions. AAO reversed one director finding on exhibitions but upheld dismissal, finding only two criteria met instead of required three. Evidence showed talent but not the sustained national acclaim required for top-tier field status.

Technology professional petitioner claimed extraordinary ability as computer scientist based on employer awards and IEEE membership. AAO held employer awards reflect internal recognition only, not nationally recognized prizes; IEEE membership requires education, not outstanding achievement. Evidence insufficient for top-level sustained acclaim.

Employer-sponsored petitioner established extraordinary ability through meeting three regulatory criteria: awards, memberships, and scholarly articles with substantial citation impact. AAO found the total evidence demonstrated sustained national acclaim and pattern placing beneficiary among the very top in field. Petition approved.

Self-petitioner claims extraordinary ability in unspecified field. Petition denied due to submission of falsified documents supporting the claim. AAO found fraud and material misrepresentation, dismissing appeal without substantive analysis of extraordinary ability criteria.

Musician claimed extraordinary ability based on judging, publications, original contributions, scholarly articles, and exhibitions. AAO found musician met judging criterion but failed publications, original contributions, scholarly articles, and exhibitions criteria. Evidence demonstrated talent and some national exposure but not sustained acclaim at the very top level.