Published AAO appeal decisions

A physicist employed by a university as assistant professor claimed extraordinary ability for O-1A visa. Petitioner met three criteria but AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at field's very top. Judging of nine journal articles and publication record lacked comparative evidence showing top-tier status.

Software engineering manager self-employed. Claimed extraordinary ability via original contributions, scholarly articles, leading role, high salary. AAO upheld three criteria met but found no sustained national or international acclaim or evidence of placement in top small percentage, dismissing appeal.

An academic medical center petitioned for a critical care physician beneficiary. The service center found initial criteria met but denied based on final merits. The AAO affirmed, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim despite publications and professional memberships, characterizing the beneficiary as diligent rather than exceptional.

A vice president and chief content officer at a media company sought EB-1A classification. She met three criteria: judging, leading role, and high salary. However, the AAO found the totality of evidence insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Project commercial manager in rail transportation claims extraordinary ability. AAO found judging evidence lacks specificity and documentation. Final merits analysis shows work on high-profile projects insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim at field's top.

Senior UX designer claimed five criteria but met only one reliably. Awards lacked proven recognition; design displays served promotional rather than artistic purposes. Insufficient criteria met and no evidence of sustained national acclaim at field top.

Software engineer director at e-commerce company seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability. Met high salary and leading role criteria but failed original contributions criterion. AAO found no evidence contributions impacted field broadly or were recognized as majorly significant beyond employer's internal benefit.

Instructional technologist with Ph.D. seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner established first prong of Dhanasar framework for substantial merit and national importance of proposed endeavor. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed second prong; evidence did not demonstrate adequate record of success or that others in field recognize his work sufficiently.

Chinese dentist and research center director sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met judging and scholarly article criteria but AAO found only two of three required criteria established. Final merits analysis concluded petitioner lacks sustained national or international acclaim and is not among small percentage at top of dental field.

SAP planning specialist employed by biopharmaceutical manufacturer claimed four additional criteria beyond two initially found met. AAO rejected awards, membership, and high salary findings; rejected final merits step finding insufficient sustained acclaim or position at top of field.

An employer petitioned for O-1A classification for a chief executive officer in culinary development. AAO affirmed revocation of initial approval, finding beneficiary failed to meet extraordinary ability criteria. Award lacked documentation of national or international recognition; business contributions did not demonstrate major significance.

A medical device company sponsored a mechanical R&D engineer for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. This was not a national interest waiver case, and no waiver was requested. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the labor certification and offered wage did not show the position needs a person of exceptional ability.

Architectural project manager seeking national interest waiver. Director found substantial merit but denied on national importance grounds. AAO affirmed; petitioner failed to demonstrate proposed work would extend beyond employer and clients or offer innovations advancing the architectural or engineering fields.

A director of program management in biomedical sciences sought EB-1A classification. He met three criteria: peer review, scholarly articles, and leading role. The AAO found the evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement at the very top of the field, dismissing the appeal.

A marketing manager sought NIW as EB-2. The AAO found he lacked the advanced degree requirement and failed the first Dhanasar prong: his proposed marketing work lacked national importance despite general industry need. Appeal dismissed.

Financial manager seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Proposed work involves financial management for private security company. Failed first Dhanasar prong: insufficient evidence that proposed financial management work has national importance, broader field implications, significant job creation potential, or substantial positive economic effects. Appeal dismissed.

Oral and maxillofacial surgeon sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification as academic surgeon teaching and mentoring residents. Petitioner met advanced degree requirement but failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor. Professional shortage and absence of female role models in field insufficient to demonstrate national impact beyond patients and trainees. Appeal dismissed.

An IT project manager with a doctorate sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, claiming five criteria. The AAO found only two criteria met (fewer than the required three), dismissed the appeal, and concluded the petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim and top-tier standing in the field.

A semiconductor staff engineer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed because he satisfied only two of ten criteria: judging and leading critical role. Original contributions lacked evidence of major significance in the field, and the record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.

AI researcher employed by data and news company met initial three criteria: judging, scholarly articles, high salary. Final merits analysis found no sustained national or international acclaim. Citation counts and letter writers' conclusions not supported by corroborating documentary evidence of field-wide impact. Appeal dismissed.

Electrical power network communications engineer seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification to strengthen U.S. power grid. AAO found first prong met but dismissed appeal because petitioner lacked sufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor under second Dhanasar prong.

A biomedical researcher sought EB-2 NIW classification under the Dhanasar framework. The AAO found the proposed research had substantial merit and national importance, but concluded the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the research, precluding NIW eligibility.

A taekwondo school sought to extend O-1A classification for an athletic trainer with prior approvals. The AAO dismissed a motion to reconsider, holding that prior extensions do not bind current decisions and the beneficiary failed to demonstrate three of eight required criteria or a major internationally recognized award.

Ice skating coach and choreographer failed to satisfy any three evidentiary criteria. Evidence did not demonstrate national or international acclaim or placement among top of field; awards were locally recognized.