AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
372 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-1AArts, design, architectureFeb 2020Dismissed
A photographer self-petitioner claims extraordinary ability under EB-1A, satisfying judging and exhibitions criteria. The AAO affirmed the service center's denial because the petitioner failed to meet three required criteria: membership in elite association, original contributions of major significance, and a leading role in a distinguished organization. The evidence lacked specificity and corroboration of field recognition.
2 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureFeb 2020Dismissed
Fashion model self-petitioner sought extraordinary ability classification. Director found petitioner met only one of ten regulatory criteria. Petitioner filed appeal without brief or specific statement of error, marked intent to submit additional evidence but failed to do so after 11 months. AAO summarily dismissed appeal for failure to identify erroneous conclusions.
1 of 8 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsJan 2020Dismissed
Professional cellist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Met four of five criteria (membership, judging, exhibitions, leading role). Published material criterion not met. Final merits determination found insufficient sustained international acclaim and top-tier standing in field. Appeal dismissed.
4 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureJan 2020Dismissed
A carpet weaver claimed six EB-1A criteria beyond the one found met (exhibitions). AAO affirmed one criterion met but rejected others: awards lacked documentation of international recognition, membership documentation was conclusory, publication lacked major media status. Only exhibitions criterion satisfied, but three required; appeal dismissed.
1 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureJan 2020Dismissed
Competitive ballroom dancer and instructor claimed extraordinary ability through three of ten criteria including awards, membership, and leading roles. AAO found only exhibitions criterion met; awards lacked national recognition, memberships were not from qualifying associations, and roles were not leading or critical. Appeal dismissed.
1 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2020Dismissed
Photographer sought EB-1A classification. Satisfied four evidentiary criteria but AAO dismissed appeal, finding record did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among small percentage at very top of field despite prizes and judging work.
4 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2020Dismissed
Chef sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification claiming six criteria initially, then four on appeal. AAO affirmed director's finding that petitioner met only one criterion and failed to establish three required. On final merits, petitioner lacks sustained national or international acclaim and does not rise to very top of culinary field.
1 of 9 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2020Dismissed
A Colombian musician claimed four of ten EB-1A criteria. AAO found two met (leading role, exhibitions) but reversed the service center on commercial success. Remezcla article lacked major media status. Only two criteria satisfied; three required. Appeal dismissed.
2 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2020Sustained
Fashion model petitioner claimed three initial criteria and demonstrated sustained international acclaim. AAO found published material, exhibitions, and high salary criteria met. Evaluating overall evidence, AAO sustained appeal, finding petitioner demonstrated extraordinary ability through acclaimed career, prestigious brand modeling, and field recognition.
4 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2020Dismissed
Illustrator and art director. Claimed extraordinary ability via awards, published material, judging, original contributions, exhibitions, and leading role. AAO found two criteria met but lacked evidence of sustained acclaim or top small percentage placement, dismissing appeal.
2 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2020Dismissed
An image consultant coaching beauty pageant contestants claimed five criteria, meeting only judging. The AAO found the remaining criteria unsatisfied and, in aggregate, lacked evidence of national or international acclaim, dismissing the appeal.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureDec 2019Dismissed
A fashion model claims extraordinary ability. She met only the judging criterion but failed awards, published material, original contributions, exhibitions, and leading role criteria. She lacked documentation for commercial success. With only one criterion met, she falls short of the three required.
1 of 9 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsDec 2019Dismissed
A television presenter and actress sought extraordinary ability classification. Although satisfying the display criterion through television and fashion work, she met only one of three required criteria. The AAO affirmed dismissal due to insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim or top-tier standing in the field.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureDec 2019Dismissed
A violinist claimed five criteria: judging and exhibitions met; awards, scholarly articles, and leading role rejected or unmet. Only two of three required criteria established. AAO dismissed appeal, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim.
2 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsDec 2019Dismissed
A Turkish filmmaker claimed extraordinary ability through six criteria. Director found three met: awards, judging, and exhibitions. AAO affirmed three criteria were met but found the totality of evidence insufficient for sustained international acclaim and top-of-field status required by statute.
3 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2019Dismissed
Dance instructor and choreographer seeks EB-1A classification claiming five criteria. AAO found she met judging and exhibitions criteria but not awards or leading role criteria. Evidence did not show sustained national or international acclaim or position among the very top of the field, so appeal dismissed.
2 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2019Dismissed
A photographer seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification claimed four criteria: published material, media coverage, original contributions, and exhibitions. The AAO found only exhibitions established and rejected the others for lack of major significance, insufficient publication credentials, and absence of evidence showing sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top.
1 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2019Dismissed
An Uzbek traditional embroiderer sought EB-1A classification, claiming five criteria. The AAO found exhibitions established but rejected membership for lack of documented selection criteria, judging for absence of formal role, and original contributions for insufficient field recognition. Director found four criteria met but AAO disagreed, finding overall record lacks evidence of sustained acclaim.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2019Dismissed
Music composer and trombonist seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification in the arts. Met judging and artistic display criteria. Failed to establish leading critical role or high salary claims due to insufficient evidence of organizational distinction and inadequate compensation comparisons. Appeal dismissed for not meeting three required initial criteria.
2 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2019Dismissed
An artist and art teacher sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found she met only one of ten required criteria: exhibition displays. Her membership rating and letters of support failed to establish major contributions. The overall record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
1 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFilm, music, performing arts2019Dismissed
A Latin reggae musician sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found he met three initial criteria: published material, judging, and performance displays. However, the final merits determination failed because the petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim after his band dissolved in 2012.
3 of 9 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2019Dismissed
A photographer self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO found he met two of ten criteria: published material and exhibitions. The appeal was dismissed because the evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or that he ranks among the small percentage at the very top of photography.
2 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2019Dismissed
Art director and visual effects artist sought EB-1A classification. Met three criteria: published material, exhibitions, and awards. However, AAO found single award eight years prior and limited press coverage insufficient to demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among small percentage at field top.
3 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2019Dismissed
An architect from Georgia sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification in architecture and design. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding he satisfied no initial evidentiary criteria and lacked evidence of sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
0 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1AMarketing, media, communications2019Dismissed
Marketing and media relations consultant claims extraordinary ability in business. Meets only two of ten criteria. AAO finds awards belonged to employer not her, published material not about her, contributions limited to company impact, and displays not artistic exhibitions. Lacks sustained national acclaim; appeal dismissed.
0 of 5 criteria metRead →
