Published AAO appeal decisions

A rhythmic gymnast sought extraordinary ability classification under EB-1A. She claimed three criteria: lesser awards, published material, and original contributions. The AAO affirmed denial, finding she did not meet any criterion because her awards lacked documented national or international recognition, her media coverage was insufficient, and she presented no evidence of original contributions of major significance.

A self-petitioner hospitality entrepreneur sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found the petitioner met two of ten criteria (published material and judging). The decision dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish the required three criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim outside his employment contexts.

Tattoo artist claimed five criteria for extraordinary ability classification. Met two initial evidentiary criteria but failed three additional ones: awards lacked national significance, original contributions not demonstrated, and critical role unsubstantiated. AAO affirmed dismissal; evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim.

A dental medical scientist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding the petitioner met the underlying advanced degree requirement but failed to establish a consistent, clearly defined proposed endeavor with substantial merit and national importance, and was not well positioned to advance the work due to lack of U.S. dental practice qualification.

Martial arts competitor and coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Satisfied awards and judging criteria only. AAO rejected membership claim lacking expert recognition documentation and published material claim lacking proper attribution and venue. Failed to meet three-criterion threshold or demonstrate top-of-field extraordinary ability.

Doctoral student seeking EB-1A classification claimed judging and original contribution criteria. AAO dismissed motions to reopen and reconsider, affirming that participation in project evaluation and conference presentations did not satisfy evidentiary requirements for extraordinary ability.

Computer engineer claimed EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability and national interest waiver. AAO held petitioner did not establish advanced degree eligibility, met only one of six exceptional ability criteria, and thus failed to establish first prong of Dhanasar framework, making waiver analysis unnecessary.

An entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW classification as advanced degree professional or exceptional ability individual. The AAO affirmed the Director's denial, finding insufficient evidence of advanced degree requirements and failure to meet three exceptional ability criteria. National interest waiver was not analyzed.

A civil engineer proposed a consulting business offering services to road and highway construction companies. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the specific endeavor has national importance under Dhanasar; describing the general importance of infrastructure and infrastructure priorities was insufficient without showing prospective impact.

Civil engineer self-petitioner claimed national interest waiver for consulting services in road and highway construction. AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite industry merit; employment potential and economic effects remain unspecified and insufficient.

Transplant surgeon seeking EB-1A classification. Claimed six criteria; service center found only two met (judging and scholarly articles). AAO affirmed, finding remaining four criteria unsatisfied and concluding cumulative evidence insufficient for extraordinary ability at very top of field.

A business executive in the fitness equipment industry sought EB-1A classification, and the service center denied the petition for lacking initial evidence. The AAO found State Department records contradicting her claimed employment history, issued a notice of intent to dismiss that was returned undeliverable, and dismissed the appeal as abandoned for no response.

Jazz percussionist and music instructor sought EB-1A classification. Met three evidentiary criteria initially but AAO held he failed final merits test, lacking sustained national or international acclaim and failing to demonstrate standing among the very top musicians in his field.

An advanced degree professional proposed a personalized fitness and wellness business. The AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance, concluding the endeavor lacked broader implications beyond servicing individual clients and would not provide substantial economic effects to merit a waiver.

Security management specialist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility as advanced degree professional or person of exceptional ability on appeal, abandoning the threshold issue. AAO dismissed appeal without addressing Dhanasar prongs.

A plant pathologist sought extraordinary ability classification based on research on tropical fruit diseases. The Director accepted two criteria; the petitioner argued a third, original contributions. The AAO dismissed the appeal because a patent without adoption or demonstrated impact did not show major significance, and the overall record lacked sustained acclaim.

A general and operations manager and self-founder of a freight transportation company sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacks national importance; it does not demonstrate national or global implications or substantial positive economic effects beyond specific clients.

A self-petitioner seeking national interest waiver for security consulting business proposed to provide expertise to U.S. companies. AAO held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because the business would operate only for specific clients without broader implications for the field or meaningful economic impact.

Entrepreneur and financier in business sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed at least three evidentiary criteria including awards and leadership role. AAO found awards lacked recognition as nationally or internationally prestigious for excellence in business and concluded petitioner lacks sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Chief technology officer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Director denied; AAO found director failed to evaluate petitioner's claimed scholarly articles criterion. AAO remanded for director to address this criterion and if satisfied conduct final merits analysis.

A soccer player met four initial extraordinary ability criteria but failed the final merits test. AAO found his 15-year career and media coverage did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of professional soccer.

Engineering researcher seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met initial three criteria requirement. Director failed to properly conduct final merits determination by not addressing substantial evidence and applying incorrect standards. AAO withdrew Director's decision and remanded for comprehensive analysis of totality.

Sound engineer and technical director in television and radio industry sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Failed to meet three of ten initial evidentiary criteria; judging and exhibitions claims withdrawn or unsupported, original contributions lacked objective attribution. AAO dismissed, finding insufficient sustained acclaim.

Entrepreneur seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree classification claimed endeavor in business consulting or biodegradable cleaning products. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner provided inconsistent and insufficient evidence of proposed endeavor, failing first prong of Dhanasar by not demonstrating national importance or broader implications.