Published AAO appeal decisions

A CEO of a healthcare consulting firm sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO found her proposed endeavor addressing rural healthcare access lacked national importance because she did not demonstrate how it would impact her field broadly beyond individual clients, and past achievements do not establish endeavor importance under Dhanasar.

Cybersecurity specialist seeks NIW to establish consulting company as CEO. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed endeavor, lacking evidence the company would operate at scale or have broader implications for cybersecurity industry despite cybersecurity being government priority.

A communications professional seeking EB-2 classification with national interest waiver claimed she would establish a marketing company as CEO. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her proposed endeavor would serve only direct clients without demonstrating broader implications or substantial national economic effects required for national importance.

A general and operations manager sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. SCOPS required evidence of intent to continue work in the field and national benefit; the petitioner did not respond to these concerns on appeal. The AAO dismissed based on waiver of the two dispositive statutory requirements.

Civil engineer with doctoral research on sustainable construction materials claimed an NIW. AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, and the petitioner was well-positioned to advance it, but rejected the waiver because evidence did not establish the national interest was sufficiently urgent to bypass labor certification.

Bacteriologist and clinical analyst claimed an NIW for consulting and entrepreneurial work in healthcare. AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance because it was limited to one company's clients and evidence did not show government interest, funding, or broad sectoral implications.

An early childhood and special education teacher sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability, plus a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding that the membership and recognition criteria were not met and that expertise significantly above the norm was not shown, and reserved the waiver question.

Spanish voiceover actor for dubbing and localization sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO remanded because service center failed to address three claimed criteria despite petitioner providing evidence in initial petition and response to RFE, denying fair opportunity to contest on appeal.

Wedding and event planner specialist seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed major award and three evidentiary criteria. AAO dismissed, finding no major award, unmet criteria for lesser awards and original contributions, and record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier field status.

A self-petitioner sought extraordinary ability classification, and the appeal was previously summarily dismissed along with earlier motions. On a second combined motion, the AAO dismissed both the motion to reopen and the motion to reconsider because no new facts, brief, evidence, or legal error were shown. No criteria were decided.

Human resources management consultant proposed consulting business targeting oil and gas sector. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance; evidence emphasized industry importance rather than specific impact of proposed endeavor beyond unidentified clients.

Construction manager and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW classification. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner did not establish exceptional ability or meet sufficient evidentiary criteria. National interest waiver issue not addressed because petitioner ineligible for underlying classification.

Hospitalist physician with medical degree and research expertise in vascular diseases sought NIW for clinical research on peripheral arterial disease. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance it, and waiver beneficial to United States.

Technology entrepreneur in hospitality industry sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed nine evidentiary criteria but failed to meet minimum three. AAO dismissed, finding venture capital funding inadequately documented and membership criterion not properly established; other criteria not analyzed as threshold requirement not met.

An assistant professor of criminology seeking EB-2 with NIW to conduct research on combating human trafficking claimed substantial merit and national importance. The AAO found substantial merit but insufficient evidence that the specific research endeavor would impact national response to trafficking at the required level.

A social and community service manager and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish that her proposed endeavor had national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, focusing on broader prospective impact rather than industry or profession importance.

Paralegal seeks EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner did not establish exceptional ability, meeting only two of six required criteria. Failure to qualify for underlying EB-2 classification rendered NIW analysis unnecessary.

Data scientist seeking NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because proposed endeavor lacks national importance; while substantial merit established, petitioner's work benefits only current employer with no demonstration of innovations or impact extending beyond employer's business interests or clients.

An engineer with a master's degree sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for research on enhancing concrete strength using wastewater byproducts. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance: it remains confined to a single employer with no demonstrated broader implications for the field or nation.

A karate coach claimed extraordinary ability and sought to open karate schools in the United States. The AAO confirmed he met two criteria—judging and leading role—but dismissed because he failed to meet the minimum three-criterion threshold required for final merits consideration.

Contact center entrepreneur seeks NIW to operate call center service provider. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner did not establish national importance of proposed endeavor. While services may benefit government clients, they lack innovation or evidence of broader industry impact or economic significance beyond company and direct clients.

Neuroscience researcher with Ph.D. seeks EB-2 self-petition with NIW for research on Alzheimer's and ataxia mechanisms using stem cells. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs met: research has national importance with broader implications, petitioner well-positioned with advanced degree and track record, and waiver benefits U.S. given urgent medical need.

A basketball coach, formerly a player, sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Though three initial criteria were facially satisfied as a player, evidence lacked sustained national or international acclaim as a coach. Coaching career began post-filing; sparsely documented coaching does not demonstrate top-level recognition. AAO dismissed.

A telecommunications CEO and entrepreneur sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver, planning a company to deploy telecom infrastructure in rural and underserved areas. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the endeavor's benefits were too attenuated to show national importance, and it did not reach the other prongs.

A sales specialist and trainer claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A sought to satisfy four criteria: published material, original contributions, leading role, and high salary. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding published material and original contributions unsubstantiated and insufficient to meet the three-criterion minimum.