Published AAO appeal decisions

High school mathematics teacher with fifteen years experience seeks NIW for EB-2 to develop hybrid and distance learning instructional framework. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to address USCIS findings on the third Dhanasar prong and waived the issue by failing to contest specific conclusions about impracticality of labor certification and national benefit.

Self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed a fourth combined motion to reopen and reconsider, holding the petitioner failed to establish that the prior decision was legally incorrect and did not provide sufficient new facts warranting reopening. The underlying petition denial stood.

A dance coach self-petitioner claimed five EB-1A criteria. SCOPS denied the petition for failing to meet three criteria. The AAO remanded because SCOPS failed to analyze all claimed criteria and did not provide reasoned explanation, denying the petitioner meaningful appellate review.

Neuroscientist with doctorate and postdoctoral experience seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. Satisfied three evidentiary criteria including scholarly articles and original contributions. AAO held final merits analysis failed because citation records and institution prestige do not establish sustained national acclaim or placement in very top of field.

Managing director of electric vehicle repair and customization shop. Claimed seven evidentiary criteria including awards and published material. AAO found none met. Awards lacked national recognition; published material articles mostly not about petitioner or from non-major media. Appeal dismissed.

Healthcare consultant and platform developer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found he met minimum evidentiary criteria but did not demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim and recognition required to place him among the small percentage at his field's top.

A rally racing athlete and entrepreneur sought extraordinary ability classification. After an earlier dismissed appeal, he filed a combined motion to reopen and reconsider. The AAO dismissed both, finding no new facts and no incorrect application of law or policy, only reargument of issues already considered.

A lead application developer in enterprise software and analytics sought EB-1A classification, claiming seven criteria. The service center accepted judging, scholarly articles and salary, then denied on final merits. The AAO agreed, finding the record did not show sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field standing, and dismissed the appeal.

A digital marketing and communications director claimed seven criteria for extraordinary ability. The AAO found only two criteria met: judging and scholarly articles. Even meeting two criteria, the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim among the small percentage at the top. Appeal dismissed.

Training and development specialist sought NIW for STEM education framework under Dhanasar. Advanced degree established. First prong failed: while endeavor had substantial merit, record lacked evidence of national importance and broad prospective impact. Framework described as scalable and replicable without detail or demonstrated innovation. Second and third prongs not reached.

Marketing professional met initial evidentiary criteria with four categories. However, AAO found evidence insufficient for final merits determination of sustained acclaim and placement among very top of field. Record lacked degree of recognition required by statute. Appeal dismissed.

Civil engineer in occupational health and safety proposes a small wastewater consulting and construction company. Claimed endeavor has national importance under Dhanasar framework. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed specific endeavor lacks national importance despite wastewater management field having it; projections insufficient to demonstrate significant economic or employment impact.

Biophysics researcher appealed USCIS EB-1A denial. USCIS found fewer than three criteria met. AAO held researcher met three initial criteria; USCIS underweighted original contributions evidence. Decision remanded for final merits determination on sustained acclaim at field's top.

A veterinarian appealed motion to reopen extraordinary ability denial. The AAO dismissed the motion, finding no new facts warranting reopening. Though meeting three regulatory criteria at step one, the appellate decision properly found insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim and top percentage standing at step two.

Mathematical and electrical engineering researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Motion to reopen granted on advanced degree issue but dismissed on merits. Proposed medical imaging research endeavor too vague at filing date; potential impacts on field and national initiatives lacked sufficient direct evidentiary support despite prior research accomplishments.

Founder and president of automotive parts wholesaler sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. Petitioner claimed academic record, ten years experience, license, and membership criteria. AAO found beneficiary met only one criterion, not the required three, so does not qualify for exceptional ability and NIW analysis not reached.

A materials chemistry scientist filed an EB-1A petition as a self-petitioner. USCIS erroneously applied the EB-1B outstanding professor standard instead of EB-1A. The AAO remanded for reconsideration under the correct statutory framework for extraordinary ability.

A business management specialist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds: the Form I-290B was not properly signed, as the signature appeared to be copied, pasted, or stamp-created rather than a valid handwritten signature personally made by the petitioner.

A data scientist sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a public policy perception analysis endeavor using data-driven technologies. Although the specific endeavor had substantial merit, AAO agreed with USCIS that the petitioner failed to establish national importance. Proposed work would operate within single employer without broader field implications or substantial economic effects. Appeal dismissed.

A chief engineer in sustainable building filed a national interest waiver petition but submitted falsified reference letters. AAO found the petitioner willfully misrepresented material facts by knowingly submitting false documents, rendering him inadmissible. Appeal dismissed due to fraud and failure to meet all three Dhanasar prongs.

Regulatory affairs manager in business seeks EB-1A. Petitioner claimed multiple criteria including awards, publications, judging, and high salary. AAO found at least three criteria met but concluded totality of evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status in the field.

A finance controller and startup CEO with an O-1 visa claimed EB-1A status. AAO found he failed to establish three criteria: membership in qualifying associations, high salary compared to field peers, and therefore fell below the threshold, dismissing the petition without reaching final merits.

Former cricket player who competed internationally 2001-2007 sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three of ten initial criteria but the AAO dismissed the appeal because the totality of evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim placing him among the very top of his field.

Software test automation engineer met all seven claimed initial criteria. However, AAO affirmed denial at final merits stage, finding evidence concentrated in 2024-2025 lacks sustained national or international acclaim. Work influence confined within company; does not demonstrate top-tier field standing.

A Brazilian healthcare specialist with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2, proposing to develop audit systems and management frameworks. The AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to establish the underlying EB-2 classification and did not demonstrate national importance of the specific proposed endeavor.