AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
9 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- O-1ABusiness and managementAug 2021Dismissed
Dismissed · 3 criteria reviewed1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementJun 2021Dismissed
Media management expert sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed judging, leading role, salary, and original contributions criteria. AAO found only judging criterion met; one criterion insufficient. Record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.
1 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementApr 2021Dismissed
Beauty products company petitioned for executive with extraordinary ability in business. Although the beneficiary met published material and leading role criteria, she failed to establish three total criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim required for EB-1A.
2 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementApr 2021Dismissed
Administrative services manager claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. AAO dismissed motions to reopen and reconsider because petitioner failed to provide new evidence timely, did not demonstrate erroneous application of law, and did not establish any of the eight evidentiary criteria.
0 of 9 criteria metRead → - O-1ABusiness and managementMar 2021Dismissed
Dismissed · 5 criteria reviewed2 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementMar 2021Dismissed
A consultant claimed extraordinary ability based on original contributions, leading role, and high salary. The AAO found only the leading role criterion met, fell short of the three-criterion minimum, and dismissed the appeal without reaching final merits analysis.
1 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementFeb 2021Dismissed
Business development specialist self-petitioner claimed four criteria and extraordinary ability. AAO upheld finding of three criteria met but determined overall evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.
3 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementFeb 2021Dismissed
A vice president and chief content officer at a media company sought EB-1A classification. She met three criteria: judging, leading role, and high salary. However, the AAO found the totality of evidence insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.
3 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and management2021Dismissed
SAP planning specialist employed by biopharmaceutical manufacturer claimed four additional criteria beyond two initially found met. AAO rejected awards, membership, and high salary findings; rejected final merits step finding insufficient sustained acclaim or position at top of field.
1 of 5 criteria metRead →
