Published AAO appeal decisions

Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.

International legal advisor in business consulting seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner claimed endeavor had national importance through ecosystem strengthening and cross-border business benefits. AAO held first Dhanasar prong unmet: proposed endeavor lacks documented national importance; cited evidence addresses general field trends, not specific endeavor impact; insufficient proof of substantial economic benefits.

Masonry and stone restoration specialist with advanced degree equivalent sought NIW for sustainable historic preservation work. Remanded because SCOPS did not determine if proposed job requires advanced degree professional and failed to explain national importance finding adequately.

AI researcher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claimed substantial merit, national importance, positioning to advance, and balance favoring waiver under Dhanasar. AAO found first prong met but rejected second and third prongs: petitioner lacks completed degree, secured funding, or concrete employment plans; waiver not shown beneficial to United States.

A cybersecurity specialist seeks NIW as an EB-2 advanced degree professional. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner did not possess an advanced degree at filing and the proposed endeavor—personal career advancement—lacks the national importance required under the first Dhanasar prong.

Senior cloud security architect petitioned for EB-2 NIW by technology company. Petitioner claimed research on AI-driven cybersecurity architectures. AAO found substantial merit but insufficient specificity and no demonstrated national importance beyond employer and clients. Appeal dismissed.

An employer petitions for software engineer beneficiary for EB-2 NIW classification. SCOPS erred by analyzing prior work rather than proposed endeavor, and failed to apply STEM field guidance. AAO withdrew SCOPS decision and remanded for proper analysis of all three Dhanasar prongs with appropriate consideration of software engineering innovation.

Agricultural scientist seeking EB-2 national interest waiver for climate-resilient farming research. AAO found proposed endeavor met substantial merit and national importance prong but applicant failed second prong: master's degrees and publication record insufficient to establish she is well positioned to advance the endeavor. Third prong not addressed due to failure on second prong.

An electrical engineering Ph.D. candidate sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research on power electronics for renewable energy. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance it via her research record and impact.

Computer scientist researching AI applications in healthcare sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Proposed work on multimodal AI systems addressing healthcare transparency. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance with global implications, applicant well positioned via expertise and prior government-funded research, and waiver beneficial to U.S. on balance given national security and competitiveness implications.

Business development manager in pharmaceutical sector seeks EB-2 NIW. SCOPS found petitioner qualified for EB-2 and met second Dhanasar prong. AAO held first prong unmet because petitioner conflated general field importance with specific endeavor's national importance; no prospective impact directly attributable to petitioner's work.

An entrepreneur with advanced degree operating a trucking and financial consulting business sought a national interest waiver under the Dhanasar framework. The AAO affirmed denial because the proposed endeavor failed the first prong: while having substantial merit, the petitioner did not establish national importance, as business impact did not extend beyond immediate clients.

An advanced degree professional proposes to own and operate an LLC providing corporate financial management services to businesses. The AAO dismissed because the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; it would impact only the LLC's clients, not the field broadly, and the petitioner did not establish broader implications beyond her business.

Cloud software developer with master's degree in computer engineering seeking EB-2 advanced degree professional status with national interest waiver for machine learning research. AAO reversed service center on first prong but dismissed appeal because petitioner lacks sufficient track record and advancement capability beyond educational credentials alone.

A lawyer and legal entrepreneur in self-petitioner status sought EB-2 with NIW. The applicant claimed substantial merit and national importance for a legal practice advising startups and cybersecurity. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance: the business plan lacked specificity about economic impact, job creation, or projected benefits; merely working in an important field is insufficient.

A mechanical engineer with a Ph.D. sought an NIW to pursue advanced manufacturing research for healthcare devices. The AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but concluded the petitioner did not demonstrate being well positioned to advance it, as education and publication citations alone do not show sufficient record of success.

Biomedical scientist with Ph.D. sought NIW for postdoctoral research on nanomembranes for cancer treatment. AAO found substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well-positioned to advance the endeavor through lack of sustained funding, clear research plan, or stakeholder interest.

Software developer with advanced degree sought national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed software development lacked national importance; generalized publications about cybersecurity importance, vague hiring projections, and absence of documented specific endeavor impact insufficient.

A solar energy entrepreneur with business degree and twelve years in renewable energy seeks NIW of job requirement. Service center denied underlying EB-2 classification without adequate explanation or RFE. AAO remanded for proper evaluation of whether advanced degree professional status and NIW eligibility were satisfied, finding denial insufficiently reasoned.

Tax auditor seeking NIW for EB-2 exceptional ability classification claimed multiple criteria. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner met only academic record and experience criteria but failed to satisfy exceptional ability threshold; waiver analysis not reached due to underlying ineligibility.

Senior engineer in AI research seeking NIW under Dhanasar framework for continued research on safe, autonomous AI systems. Service center's denial lacked complete analysis of evidence, made contradictory statements, and failed to address all arguments. Remanded for proper application of all three Dhanasar prongs with complete evidentiary analysis.

An airplane pilot sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a proposed aviation training business in Florida. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. The business plan lacked specifics on wages, worker numbers, location, and how the endeavor would have broader implications beyond the aviation industry.

Research scientist with master's degree in electrical and computer engineering proposed to advance privacy-preserving IoT technology. AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded petitioner lacks concrete steps toward employment or demonstrated feasibility, failing the second Dhanasar prong.

A computer scientist proposed developing machine learning algorithms for precision medicine and drug discovery. Although the AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, it affirmed the service center's finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the research, lacking comparable evidence to established precedent.

A management and financial analyst sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for a business venture. The AAO dismissed her second motion to reopen and reconsider because she submitted no new facts or evidence, and her contentions reasserted already-rejected arguments without establishing legal or policy error in prior decisions.