Published AAO appeal decisions

Software development company petitioning for CEO beneficiary for EB-1A extraordinary ability. USCIS approved three criteria; AAO withdrew original contributions finding, leaving only two criteria met. Final merits determination failed to show top-tier standing, dismissing appeal.

Supply chain and materials management professional met three initial EB-1A criteria through published material, judging, and critical role. However, AAO affirmed dismissal because evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner rose to the small percentage at the very top of his field.

A semiconductor technology researcher with a Ph.D. sought NIW under Dhanasar. USCIS denied, finding advanced degree qualification but failing all three Dhanasar prongs. AAO remanded, finding USCIS did not meaningfully evaluate the record or address petitioner's evidence.

Technology startup founder seeking EB-1A classification claimed eight evidentiary criteria; SCOPS found six met and AAO confirmed leading role criterion. However, AAO rejected the petition because sustained national or international acclaim was not demonstrated, with nearly all achievements from 2024-2025 and recognition limited to startup ecosystems, failing final merits review.

Mathematical and electrical engineering researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Motion to reopen granted on advanced degree issue but dismissed on merits. Proposed medical imaging research endeavor too vague at filing date; potential impacts on field and national initiatives lacked sufficient direct evidentiary support despite prior research accomplishments.

A software engineer with master's degree in computer science seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for designing novel algorithms in private cloud storage. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond the employer's specific needs.

Software test automation engineer met all seven claimed initial criteria. However, AAO affirmed denial at final merits stage, finding evidence concentrated in 2024-2025 lacks sustained national or international acclaim. Work influence confined within company; does not demonstrate top-tier field standing.

Software engineer proposing AI infrastructure development for large language models advancing U.S. innovation seeks NIW under EB-2. AAO remanded because record was incomplete with illegible exhibits and SCOPS did not fully evaluate all three Dhanasar prongs. Petitioner to resubmit clear copies and articulate national importance and balance analysis.

A systems engineering specialist sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance under Dhanasar. Working in telecommunications generally does not establish specific endeavor importance; broader industry relevance was insufficient.

A technology corporation sponsored an engineer for EB-2 with NIW to advance wireless RF digital module design. The petitioner failed to address the third Dhanasar prong (balance favoring waiver) including labor certification impracticality; the appeal arguments were limited and did not meaningfully contest the service center's denial. The appeal was dismissed as the third prong is dispositive.

A cloud technology expert sought extraordinary ability classification. After two prior denials and reopenings by the service center, a third denial was issued without affording the petitioner thirty days to submit a brief as required by regulation. The AAO remanded to cure the procedural defect.

A research scientist in machine learning and generative AI claimed six criteria. The service center accepted four of them, then denied the petition at the final merits stage. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the fellowship award and limited media coverage did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.

Data scientist in financial technology and artificial intelligence employed as vice president sought EB-1A classification. Met three criteria initially established by service center, but AAO withdrew the awards finding and found the totality of evidence insufficient to demonstrate extraordinary ability and placement among the top percentage of the field.

An entrepreneur in STEM education filed a motion to reconsider an NIW denial for an EB-2 national interest waiver for a coding academy. The AAO affirmed the prior decision that the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong: the proposed academy lacked independent corroboration of national importance and would not impact the field beyond local scope.

Computer systems analyst claims extraordinary ability in sciences. Met at least three initial evidentiary criteria including leading role, membership, and salary. AAO found evidence lacks sustained acclaim over long period and achievements not recognized in field through extensive documentation. Appeal dismissed.

Business and financial management company sponsored beneficiary in artificial intelligence and computer vision. AAO withdrew SCOPS' findings on all four criteria due to insufficient evidence and analysis, concluding record does not meet minimum three-criterion threshold for extraordinary ability.

Data security and compliance professional with exceptional ability sought NIW for consultancy serving small and medium enterprises and educational institutions. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish national importance; evidence lacked sufficient detail showing the specific company's endeavor would achieve substantial positive economic effects at national scale.

An AI investment bank petitioned for its founder, a technology entrepreneur, claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A. The beneficiary claimed seven criteria. The AAO found venture capital funding is not an award for excellence and Forbes Technology Council membership does not require outstanding achievement judged by experts, dismissing the appeal.

Cybersecurity professional with Master's degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver without job offer. AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite claimed expertise in enterprise platforms. Unsupported assertions about billion-dollar transactions and strategic alignment insufficient without corroborating evidence of specific prospective impact.

Telecommunications engineer sought EB-2 NIW for startup company providing connectivity and cybersecurity solutions. SCOPS found substantial merit but denied lack of national importance. AAO affirmed, finding proposed endeavor lacked specific details about services, job creation, and scale necessary to demonstrate national importance.

An AI consulting firm sought EB-1A classification for a chief technology officer. The AAO found the beneficiary met the judging criterion on appeal, satisfying three total criteria. The matter was remanded for a final merits determination on whether the beneficiary demonstrates sustained acclaim and placement at the very top of the field.

A research scientist with a master's degree in electrical and computer engineering sought an NIW for EB-2 classification. The AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but dismissed because the petitioner lacked a concrete plan and employment pursuit evidence to demonstrate he was well-positioned to advance it.

Software engineering manager in cloud computing and AI-driven platforms sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO dismissed the appeal because although the petitioner met three initial criteria, the totality of evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or that he ranks among the very top of his field.

An IT systems engineer seeking EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver filed a self-petition. The AAO found the beneficiary qualified for EB-2 as an advanced degree professional but failed to establish national importance of his proposed endeavor. The vague business plan lacked evidence of significant employment creation or economic benefits at regional or national levels.