Published AAO appeal decisions

International consultant and policy analyst self-petitioner claimed four alternate criteria for extraordinary ability. AAO upheld USCIS denial, finding petitioner met only the leading role criterion but failed on awards, published material, and original contributions. Threshold of three criteria not satisfied; final merits declined.

Lawyer and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW to establish firm facilitating Brazilian-U.S. business connections. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong because beneficiary showed insufficient broader field impact and inadequate projections demonstrating substantial economic benefits.

A Middle East analyst sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found the petitioner met three initial criteria (judging, scholarly articles, critical roles) but dismissed the appeal, concluding the evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim placing him among the field's very top.

An assistant professor of sociology seeking EB-2 with NIW claimed her research on criminal justice reform technology has national importance. The AAO found her endeavor has substantial merit but lacks the specific prospective national impact required under Dhanasar, dismissing the appeal.

A legal consultant sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, claiming six regulatory criteria including awards, published materials, and original contributions. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the awards lacked national or international recognition and published materials documentation was incomplete; because the petitioner failed to establish three initial criteria, final merits were not reached.

A business legal consultant appealed AAO dismissal on motion to reconsider, challenging criterion findings. The AAO dismissed the motion, holding petitioner met judging and scholarly articles criteria but failed final merits analysis, lacking sustained acclaim and elite field standing. Petitioner did not adequately address the dispositive final merits determination.

Legal consultant self-petitioned for EB-2 NIW to facilitate business transactions for U.S. investors entering Albanian market. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance because impact limited to individual clients without broader field implications. Appeal dismissed.

An international program director and public policy analyst sought EB-1A classification, claiming nine evidentiary criteria. The service center accepted one; the AAO accepted a second, scholarly articles, but rejected the rest it analyzed and found no sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing, so the appeal was dismissed.

A Brazilian lawyer and prosecutor self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO found petitioner met four criteria (judging, scholarly articles, leading roles, though not high salary). However, in the final merits determination, the AAO held the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or elite status in the field.

Legal consultant in alternative dispute resolution sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Proposed establishing consultancy for ADR and public bond investment. AAO dismissed, finding the specific endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance; petitioner confused field importance with endeavor-specific impact and failed to show broader implications.

A journalist from Kazakhstan with roles as poet, writer, and performer sought EB-1A classification. The AAO dismissed, finding she did not establish three of ten criteria: no major award, membership organizations lack required standards, and blog posts do not constitute scholarly articles. Threshold not met; final merits not reached.

Social work program manager entrepreneur seeks NIW to establish mental health technology platform for students, school staff, and parents via mobile app and consulting. Petition claimed substantial merit and national importance. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance; impact limited to individual clients without broader field-wide or economic effects.

A lawyer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner claimed four criteria: judging, original contributions, scholarly articles, and leading/critical role. The AAO found judging and contributions not met and declined to address the other two, dismissing for failure to satisfy the threshold of three criteria.

A food and product safety compliance professional sought EB-1A classification. The service center accepted three criteria and the petitioner claimed three more on appeal, which the AAO reserved. The AAO dismissed the appeal at the final merits step because the impact seemed limited to his employer and acclaim was not shown.

A lawyer sought EB-2 national interest waiver (NIW). He initially stated vague intent to continue studies and practice, then materially changed his proposed endeavor on appeal to establish a legal consulting and education business. The AAO dismissed because he did not establish a specific proposed endeavor at filing, and changed proposals cannot cure defects.

A Kazakh law professor sought EB-1A classification as alien of extraordinary ability. Although meeting three evidentiary criteria—judging, scholarly articles, and high salary—the AAO affirmed SCOPS finding that the petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim necessary to demonstrate extraordinary ability at the highest level.

An attorney with advanced degrees seeks NIW to develop AI legal technology. AAO dismissed appeal, holding that while industry importance aligns with government priorities, petitioner failed demonstrating specific proposed endeavor's prospective impact at national importance level required by Dhanasar.

Occupational health professional appealed NIW denial under Dhanasar framework. AAO affirmed that while proposed endeavor had substantial merit, petitioner failed to establish its national importance. Consulting business lacked sufficiently specific prospective national impact and significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial economic effects. Appeal dismissed.

A law and policy specialist in technology law and AI ethics sought EB-1A classification. AAO found petitioner did not satisfy three of ten initial criteria including membership, published materials, original contributions, leading role, and high salary. Initial evidence threshold not met; final merits analysis not reached.

Attorney specializing in intellectual property and cybercrime seeking EB-2 NIW proposed consulting business with claimed job creation and tax benefits. AAO dismissed, finding endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and evidence does not demonstrate broader impact on field beyond specific business and clients.

Associate attorney holding advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for continued practice in cross-border tax law and foreign investment facilitation. SCOPS granted advanced degree qualification but denied waiver. AAO affirmed: petitioner's field and experience are material to second prong but immaterial to first prong; specific endeavor lacks evidence of broader implications, job creation, or substantial economic effects constituting national importance. Appeal dismissed.

An attorney proposed work as a professional mediator through her own company. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the applicant failed the first prong because individual mediation services lacked national importance; she provided no expert evidence showing field-wide impact or connection to national initiatives.

Legal researcher and lecturer in human rights law claimed six criteria; USCIS found four met. AAO affirmed four criteria were satisfied but held applicant failed final merits analysis, finding insufficient sustained acclaim and failure to demonstrate position among very top of field.

Conflict resolution consultant with master's degree in global development and peace seeks NIW. AAO dismissed appeal because proposed endeavor, though with substantial merit, lacks sufficient evidence of broader field impact and qualitative significance required for national importance under Dhanasar.

A legal consultant with a recent law degree sought EB-1A classification. The AAO found two claimed criteria unmet: membership in professional associations lacked evidence of outstanding achievement requirements, and a published article did not qualify as scholarly work for learned professionals. No final merits analysis followed.