Published AAO appeal decisions

Research scientist with master's degree in electrical and computer engineering proposed to advance privacy-preserving IoT technology. AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded petitioner lacks concrete steps toward employment or demonstrated feasibility, failing the second Dhanasar prong.

A computer scientist proposed developing machine learning algorithms for precision medicine and drug discovery. Although the AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, it affirmed the service center's finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the research, lacking comparable evidence to established precedent.

IT professional petitioner sought NIW for proposed cybersecurity consulting and training company. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding petitioner failed Dhanasar first prong: national importance lacks evidentiary support. Twelve-employee projection, general industry talent shortage, and letters insufficient to show substantial prospective impact. Second and third prongs reserved.

Communication engineer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed that petitioner met at least three evidentiary criteria but dismissed appeal, finding totality of evidence does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or rise to very top of field.

Machine learning researcher with master's degree sought EB-2 NIW. AAO found substantial merit and national importance of research and that petitioner was well positioned to advance it, but dismissed appeal because urgency of national interest was not established and labor certification remained practicable.

Software engineer with master's degree seeking NIW for cybersecurity work. AAO affirmed SCOPS finding that proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar first prong because work limited to employer, not advancing broader industry. Appeal dismissed without reaching second and third prongs.

Oracle technical consultant seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree petition. Petitioner qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed to establish endeavor's national importance; company would benefit individual clients and SMBs without demonstrating broader field, regional, or national impact required by Dhanasar.

A research scientist self-petitioned for EB-2 national interest waiver based on her proposed machine learning and single-cell RNA research. The AAO dismissed because the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond the importance of the field itself. The record provided only generalized information and publication citations unrelated to the specific endeavor's broader impact.

A public health informatics fellow sought EB-2 NIW classification for self-petitioned waiver. The applicant held an advanced degree but failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific proposed endeavor in the Dhanasar first prong. The appeal was dismissed without addressing other prongs.

A petitioner in cybersecurity and IT governance filed a motion to reopen a dismissed NIW petition. The AAO dismissed the motion, finding the new executive orders and strategic documents did not establish new facts warranting reconsideration, as they did not address errors in prior dismissals or demonstrate changed circumstances.

A graduate research and teaching assistant in computer science sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for AI research in medical diagnostics. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding he did not satisfy the second Dhanasar prong because he lacked adequate graduate credentials, strong publication records, secured research positions, or demonstrated funding.

A petitioner sought NIW EB-2 classification but the service center denied it without adequately analyzing the evidence. The AAO remanded, finding the service center did not properly discuss the petitioner's detailed endeavor description, did not evaluate factors in totality for the second prong, and did not adequately weigh considerations for the third prong.

Software engineer proposed AI and machine learning voice biometrics authentication system as self-petitioner for national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because the specific endeavor lacked sufficient national importance, finding alignment with government initiatives and field importance alone insufficient without concrete economic impact projections.

A telecommunications engineer seeking EB-2 classification with national interest waiver claimed his endeavor would involve the BEAD broadband program. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and detail about what activities he actually intended to undertake, making it impossible to assess national importance.

Machine learning engineer appealed SCOPS denial of EB-1A petition. AAO found petitioner demonstrated original contributions of major significance through highly cited research, meeting the initial evidence threshold. Matter remanded for final merits determination of sustained acclaim.

IT specialist specializing in national security sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for an endeavor to improve digital security and IT management practices across U.S. sectors. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner's expertise and past accomplishments do not establish the proposed endeavor's national importance; the work would not sufficiently impact the field beyond prospective customers.

Cybersecurity specialist seeks NIW to establish consulting company as CEO. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed endeavor, lacking evidence the company would operate at scale or have broader implications for cybersecurity industry despite cybersecurity being government priority.

A systems engineer in education technology sought extraordinary ability classification for developing an e-learning platform. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner satisfied only two of ten required criteria and failed to establish original contributions of major significance in the field.

Computer science researcher sought EB-2 NIW. Petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional and proposed AI and mental health research. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner not well-positioned under Dhanasar prong two; publication and citation rates unexceptional relative to field, and insufficient evidence of progress or sustained interest in proposed endeavor.

IT manager of exceptional ability sought EB-2 NIW. AAO affirmed failure to establish underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification (missing three regulatory criteria) and held proposed endeavor lacks national importance; first Dhanasar prong unmet, waiver denied.

Blockchain engineer seeking EB-2 NIW classification for exceptional ability. Failed to satisfy at least three of six regulatory criteria for exceptional ability, including membership in professional associations, salary evidence, and recognition for significant contributions to industry. Underlying EB-2 eligibility not established.

A computer vision engineer with Master's in electrical and computer engineering sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. AAO found proposed AI research had substantial merit and national importance but concluded petitioner lacked sufficient record of success, detailed plan, or financial means to advance the endeavor.

An EB-2 advanced degree holder sought a national interest waiver for a STEM research endeavor. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed research had substantial merit but lacked national importance because the evidence did not demonstrate sufficiently broad impact beyond the individual's work.

A researcher with published work seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver to pursue computer science research and lecturer position applying computer science to business processes. She failed to demonstrate her research has national importance or broader field impact and did not establish she is well-positioned to advance the endeavor. The AAO dismissed the appeal.

IT sales manager with advanced degree seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO upheld denial, finding petitioner established substantial merit but failed to show national importance; stated intention to work in important field does not establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor.