Published AAO appeal decisions

A military officer with advanced degree in special and tactical operations seeks EB-2 NIW. The petitioner proposed creating a security consulting company. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor fails to demonstrate national importance or substantial economic effects under Dhanasar.

Operations professional sought EB-2 exceptional ability and national interest waiver. AAO found he met the educational credential criterion but not the salary criterion for exceptional ability. Because he failed the underlying EB-2 threshold, the national interest waiver analysis was not pursued.

A self-petitioner hospitality entrepreneur sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found the petitioner met two of ten criteria (published material and judging). The decision dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish the required three criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim outside his employment contexts.

A business executive in the fitness equipment industry sought EB-1A classification, and the service center denied the petition for lacking initial evidence. The AAO found State Department records contradicting her claimed employment history, issued a notice of intent to dismiss that was returned undeliverable, and dismissed the appeal as abandoned for no response.

Security management specialist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility as advanced degree professional or person of exceptional ability on appeal, abandoning the threshold issue. AAO dismissed appeal without addressing Dhanasar prongs.

A self-petitioner seeking national interest waiver for security consulting business proposed to provide expertise to U.S. companies. AAO held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because the business would operate only for specific clients without broader implications for the field or meaningful economic impact.

Entrepreneur and financier in business sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed at least three evidentiary criteria including awards and leadership role. AAO found awards lacked recognition as nationally or internationally prestigious for excellence in business and concluded petitioner lacks sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Supply chain manager sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner submitted conflicting descriptions of her endeavor between initial petition and RFE response, later mentioning vegan cosmetic imports. AAO found insufficient clarity and consistency to identify the specific proposed endeavor and ruled it lacked national importance.

A sales director seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO held he did not qualify for underlying EB-2 classification as exceptional ability, having failed to meet at least three of six regulatory criteria. National interest waiver analysis was not reached because eligibility for the base classification was not established.

Pharmaceutical executive with 25 years experience sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner met published material criterion but failed to establish at least three required criteria for extraordinary ability. AAO held insufficient evidence of national or international acclaim.

General and operations manager applied for NIW under EB-2 with advanced degree. Petitioner proposed consulting services for general operations management and entrepreneurship. AAO affirmed Director's finding that while work had substantial merit, it lacked national importance; no evidence showed broader field impact or substantial positive economic effects for U.S. economy.

Media production agency petitioned for O-1A classification for senior vice president of production finance. AAO dismissed motions, finding only one criterion met and insufficient documentation of membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.

Bank manager seeking national interest waiver. Director found substantial merit but denied on national importance grounds. AAO affirmed and additionally withdrew director's second-prong finding due to petitioner's inconsistent evidence about the proposed endeavor.

A digital product and business manager in mobile communications claimed three criteria but could not substantiate high remuneration with proper comparative salary data for UK positions and long-term compensation. AAO dismissed, finding the incomplete survey data inadequate and declining to reach other claimed criteria or prospective benefit analysis.

A CEO of a cleaning service company sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He failed to meet the required three initial evidentiary criteria; his entrepreneurship award was student-limited, and chamber membership lacked the outstanding achievement requirement, leaving him ineligible for final merits analysis.

Entrepreneur and venture capitalist in information and communications technology sought EB-2 NIW classification. Proposed to provide consulting and training services. AAO dismissed, finding proposed work lacks national importance under Dhanasar first prong; services too limited to company clientele without substantial economic benefit.

A marketing manager sought NIW under EB-2. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed the first prong of Dhanasar: the specific proposed endeavor lacked national importance. While marketing management is important generally, his particular services showed no demonstrated substantial economic impact or job creation potential.

Legal analyst sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Director found advanced degree qualification and substantial merit but denied waiver, finding no national importance. AAO affirmed, holding specific endeavor lacks broader implications beyond immediate employer and clients.

Project manager sought EB-2 advanced degree and exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate advanced degree (insufficient post-baccalaureate experience) and did not meet three exceptional ability criteria, making NIW analysis moot.

Business operations specialist claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, meeting two of ten criteria initially: leading role and high salary. On appeal, claimed published material criterion but AAO found translations inaccurate and uncertified. AAO dismissed, finding insufficient evidence of acclaim or top-tier status despite meeting two criteria.

An admissions and marketing director sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO found he met the advanced degree requirement but dismissed the appeal because his proposed work in higher education admissions lacked demonstrated national importance or substantial economic impact as required under Dhanasar's first prong.

Business development manager with advanced degree sought NIW for EB-2 proposing sales strategy development in cybersecurity and IT. AAO found substantial merit but dismissed because proposed work lacked broader implications for the industry or economy at level of national importance.

Self-petitioner chief executive proposing to operate a domestic animal services company. Claimed national interest waiver under Dhanasar framework. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance; no evidence of prospective impact beyond the business itself or substantial economic effects for the nation.

An administrative and financial manager sought EB-2 NIW for managing Brazilian business operations. The AAO dismissed because the evidence failed to show national importance; the work lacked implications beyond the specific employer and clients, rising only to company-specific benefit rather than national impact.

Sales manager with advanced degree sought NIW under Dhanasar. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance, as sales management activities would not extend beyond employer or impact tourism industry broadly or generate substantial U.S. job creation.