Published AAO appeal decisions

Senior software engineer with PhD in computer science proposes distributed query optimization research. AAO found the research endeavor meritorious but distinguished between proposed independent research and employer-specific benefits, finding the latter lacks national importance. Petition dismissed because petitioner failed second prong.

Digital marketing and computer vision entrepreneur self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed five evidentiary criteria but met only one regarding published articles. AAO withdrew SCOPS salary finding and affirmed that petitioner failed three-criterion threshold for immigrant visa eligibility.

A senior research scientist with a PhD sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification in artificial intelligence and privacy technology. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed research lacked demonstrated national importance under Dhanasar's first prong despite the field's merit and importance.

A software engineer sought NIW for cloud computing work. AAO agreed that although the field has substantial merit, the petitioner's specific proposed endeavor lacks national importance. Petitioner failed to demonstrate broader implications beyond his company or how his work would impact the industry or region more broadly.

Petitioner is an applied scientist with a master's degree in computer science proposing AI research. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish that his specific proposed endeavor has national importance; generalized claims about AI advancement without detailed prospective work plans are insufficient.

AI manufacturer petitioned for beneficiary's EB-2 national interest waiver. Beneficiary qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed NIW Dhanasar first prong; proposed work lacked demonstrated national importance and broader implications beyond company and clients.

Employer-sponsored semiconductor engineer with master's degree seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for system-level test development work. Claimed endeavor has national importance due to semiconductor industry value and testing standard implications. AAO found importance of field insufficient; specific proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated broader prospective impact.

Software developer seeks NIW for EB-2 to develop universal AI architecture addressing bias in algorithms. AAO dismissed appeal, holding the specific proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite alignment with important AI field; merely working in an important industry insufficient.

Machine learning engineer sought EB-2 with NIW for AI-driven smart vehicle manufacturing research. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, conflating field importance with endeavor-specific impact under Dhanasar's first prong.

Computer scientist with master's degree in engineering proposed advancing AI research in deep learning for data analysis and virtual assistants. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but petitioner is not well positioned to advance it due to insufficient record of success and impact. Appeal dismissed on second prong failure.

An artificial intelligence researcher sought EB-2 with national interest waiver without labor certification. The AAO affirmed the service center's finding that the proposed research endeavor lacked the substantial merit and national importance required under Dhanasar's first prong, dismissing the appeal.

Computer scientist employed as engineering associate proposed developing proprietary software for AI safety and trust. AAO affirmed denial because proposed work lacked national importance, benefiting only the specific employer despite national footprint, even though petitioner was well positioned.

AI robotics entrepreneur claims EB-2 exceptional ability. Petitioner meets advanced degree criterion but fails to meet three of six exceptional ability criteria required for classification. Bachelor's degree in aeronautics not demonstrated to relate to robotics endeavor. Comparable evidence for remaining criteria insufficient. Categorical ineligibility established; NIW not reached.

Graduate research assistant in cybersecurity sought EB-2 with NIW for autonomous vehicle security research. AAO found substantial merit but dismissed because petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor or demonstrate being well-positioned to advance it under Dhanasar framework.

Industrial engineer with Ph.D. seeking EB-2 NIW for developing advanced three-dimensional AI chips. Qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed first Dhanasar prong: proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated substantial merit and national importance. AAO affirmed denial without reaching remaining prongs.

A cloud engineer sought extraordinary ability classification through five criteria. The AAO affirmed that she met only two criteria (judging and scholarly articles), did not meet the threshold of three required criteria, and lacked demonstrated sustained acclaim for the elite classification.

A life sciences and digital solutions executive met three initial EB-1A criteria but failed the final merits determination. The AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work to demonstrate extraordinary ability in the field.

Computer security researcher sought EB-2 NIW to continue research on software security tools for consumer devices and services. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance; evidence focused on petitioner's qualifications and field importance rather than proposed endeavor's prospective impact beyond employer.

AI researcher sought EB-2 NIW classification claiming exceptional ability. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met only two of three required criteria for exceptional ability: official academic record and professional association membership, but not recognition for achievements and significant contributions in AI field.

Business professional in financial technology seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met only one required criterion (leading critical role) out of three needed; original contributions lacked major significance and salary was not substantially higher than comparable positions.

Industrial engineering doctoral student and researcher seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to continue research on graph neural networks for environmental monitoring and real-time video processing. AAO found endeavor nationally important but petitioner lacked PhD-level credentials, demonstrated record of success in the field, concrete plan, or progress toward the specific endeavor; appeal dismissed.

Ph.D. student in computer science pursuing generative AI research sought NIW under Dhanasar. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but petitioner failed second prong: insufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance research through citations, progress, or field recognition.

A researcher and assistant professor sought NIW for EB-2 under Dhanasar. The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded the petitioner was not well-positioned to advance it, lacking demonstrated influence, institutional support, or feasible funding for research plans.

Senior security researcher seeks NIW for cybersecurity innovations. AAO dismissed finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; work benefits only specific employers and clients without broader field or national security implications.

Cybersecurity engineer employed as head of detection engineering sought EB-1A classification. Met initial three criteria: judging, scholarly articles, leading role, and high salary. However, final merits analysis found insufficient sustained national or international acclaim to demonstrate extraordinary ability at top percentage level.