Published AAO appeal decisions

A ceramic artist self-petitioner claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. The AAO found he met four initial evidentiary criteria but determined on final merits that the evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of his field, distinguishing him from merely very good artists.

Fintech business executive sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met one of ten initial criteria. AAO affirmed director's rejection of scholarly article authorship and high salary criteria due to insufficient evidence of scholarly publication and unexplained salary discrepancies.

Advanced degree professional seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for proposed pastry shop business. Petitioner claimed endeavor would promote healthier eating and create jobs aligned with national health goals. AAO found insufficient evidence that the specific proposed endeavor has national importance, requiring broader implications than claimed.

A petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to identify which of the ten regulatory criteria she claimed to meet or how her evidence related to each criterion, making substantive analysis impossible.

A CEO with AI and software expertise sought NIW as EB-2. The service center approved his advanced degree status but denied the waiver, finding no evidence the endeavor transcends personal clients to achieve national significance. The AAO affirmed, distinguishing petitioner's qualifications from the endeavor's prospective impact requirement.

A business petitioned for O-1A status for a physiotherapist, and the director denied it for failing the initial evidentiary requirements. On appeal, the AAO found the matter moot because another petition for the same worker had since been approved, so it did not reach the merits and dismissed the appeal.

A dancer and choreographer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification claiming seven criteria. The AAO found the petitioner met the exhibitions criterion but failed to establish three of ten required criteria. Without meeting the threshold evidence requirement, the AAO dismissed the appeal without reaching a final merits determination.

Doctoral nutrition science student seeks EB-2 advanced degree and national interest waiver for research on nutrition, obesity, and sustainable farming. AAO held endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; expert letters insufficient to demonstrate specific prospective impact on field broadly.

Singer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO held she met only one of ten initial criteria (judging); failed to satisfy three-criterion threshold. Evidence of awards lacked international recognition, organizational memberships uncertified, published material articles improperly documented, and overall record failed to show sustained acclaim at field's top tier.

A financial consultant sought NIW as EB-2 to operate a strategic advisory firm. The service center approved his advanced degree status but denied national interest waiver, finding insufficient evidence of endeavor's national importance. The AAO affirmed, holding unsupported projections of job creation and revenue insufficient to demonstrate national significance.

Physical therapist seeks EB-2 with NIW for consulting business in Pennsylvania/Nevada/Arizona region. Claimed endeavor has national importance with revenue and employment projections. AAO held first prong unmet: business projections unsubstantiated; no evidence of broader field impact, significant worker population reach, or national economic significance.

Investment firm petitions for O-1A classification for external managers evaluation specialist. Petitioner failed to submit required advisory opinion and satisfied only two of eight evidentiary criteria. Missing published material documentation and failing to establish three alternate criteria, petition dismissed.

An energy efficiency professional seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability claimed five criteria: awards, published material, original contributions, leading role, judging, and scholarly articles. AAO found he failed to establish three qualifying criteria and lacks evidence of upper-echelon status.

An entrepreneur seeking EB-2 exceptional ability and national interest waiver for a transportation services business. The AAO affirmed that the proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong because it would benefit only the petitioner's customers without broader industry implications or substantial economic effects commensurate with national importance.

A pilot sought EB-2 NIW for work as search and rescue and air ambulance pilot-instructor. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish national importance: the proposed work would not have broader implications for aviation, did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers, and offered no substantial economic effects.

Electrical and computer engineering researcher with master's degree sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. AAO found the proposed research endeavor has national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance it.

Nutritionist seeks EB-2 NIW to provide nutrition services and education addressing childhood obesity and chronic disease. Petitioner claimed alignment with federal STEM and health initiatives and job creation, but lacked evidence of national importance. AAO dismissed because endeavor operates in single location and lacks requisite prospective impact affecting broader economy.

Radiologist seeking NIW for radiological protection management consulting business. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to meet at least three exceptional ability criteria required for underlying EB-2 classification, making NIW eligibility determination unnecessary.

Self-petitioner water resources engineer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner met only two of ten criteria (articles and judging) and failed to establish national or international acclaim or standing among top percentage of field despite research contributions.

A consultant sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver for a business providing marketing and digital services to disadvantaged small businesses. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the endeavor lacks national importance despite industry articles establishing merit; services benefit only immediate clients without broader implications for the field.

A researcher claimed extraordinary ability in sciences, meeting two of ten criteria (judging, scholarly articles). AAO affirmed dismissal because original contributions lacked major significance and evidence of citations was only incremental contribution; no sustained national or international acclaim demonstrated.

An electronics technician proposed a pool heating and automation business claiming national importance for sustainability. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the specific proposed endeavor lacked national importance; letters from professors did not demonstrate how routine pool installation services would have broader implications or substantial economic effects.

An engineer sought EB-2 with NIW to open a consulting firm serving small/medium construction companies. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance. Arguments about environmental and economic benefits were insufficient under Dhanasar framework.

A furniture business owner and chief executive sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming lesser awards, a leading role and high salary. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the awards criterion was not established, three criteria were not shown, and the record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.

A human resources specialist sought EB-2 NIW for a proposed HR consulting company offering diversity and inclusion workshops. The AAO dismissed, holding the endeavor lacks national importance because services to individual clients and companies, despite focus on vulnerable populations, lack prospective impact on field or national scale.